Home » Consumer Goods » Wine Corks Market

Wine Corks Market By Material (Plastic, Metal, Glass, Wood); By Process (Natural, Synthetic); By Distribution Channel (Offline, Online); By Region – Growth, Share, Opportunities & Competitive Analysis, 2024 – 2032

Price: $4999

Published: | Report ID: 36862 | Report Format : PDF
REPORT ATTRIBUTE DETAILS
Historical Period  2019-2022
Base Year  2023
Forecast Period  2024-2032
Wine Corks Market Size 2024  USD 6864.8 Million
Wine Corks Market, CAGR  5.09%
Wine Corks Market Size 2032  USD 11193.48 Million

Market Overview

The Wine Corks Market is projected to witness substantial growth, with its value expected to surge from USD 6864.8 million in 2024 to USD 11193.48 million by 2032, reflecting a remarkable CAGR of 5.09%.

The Wine Corks Market is being propelled by several key drivers and trends. Increasing wine consumption globally, coupled with a growing preference for premium wines, is fostering demand for high-quality cork closures. Additionally, rising environmental awareness and the shift towards sustainable packaging solutions are driving the adoption of natural cork closures over synthetic alternatives. Moreover, advancements in cork technology, such as improved sealing efficiency and preservation capabilities, are further enhancing market growth. These factors collectively contribute to the dynamic expansion of the Wine Corks Market, presenting lucrative opportunities for industry players to innovate and meet evolving consumer demands.

Geographical analysis reveals a diversified landscape in the Wine Corks Market, with key regions including Europe, North America, Asia Pacific, and Latin America. Europe, particularly countries like Spain and Portugal, dominates the market owing to their rich history of wine production and traditional cork usage. North America follows closely, driven by the flourishing wine industry in the United States. Asia Pacific exhibits significant growth potential, fueled by increasing wine consumption in emerging markets like China and India. Key players in the market include Amorim Cork, Nomacorc LLC, Cork Supply Group, Vinventions, and Trefinos. These companies are actively engaging in strategic initiatives to consolidate their market presence and capitalize on emerging opportunities.

Design Element 2

Access crucial information at unmatched prices!

Request your free sample report today & start making informed decisions powered by Credence Research!

Download Free Sample
CTA Design Element 3

Market Drivers

Safety Concerns and Side Effects:

While generally well-tolerated, ACE inhibitors can cause side effects like dry cough, dizziness, headache, and angioedema (swelling of the face, lips, tongue, or throat). For instance, ACE inhibitors have a relatively low incidence of side effects and are well tolerated; however, dry cough is common, appearing in 10-30% of patients. One in four people taking an ACE inhibitor develop a bothersome dry cough. Other side effects include dizziness, which affects 12–19% of people who take ACE inhibitors, and angioedema, which is swelling in the deep layers of skin, including potentially around organs. In terms of patient non-adherence to treatment, it has been found that approximately 40% of the patients who initiated ACE inhibitors following hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction became non-adherent during the first treatment year. Another study found that 18% of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients appeared to exhibit less than 70% adherence with their ACE inhibitor treatment, with 34% exhibiting less than 85% adherence and 58% exhibiting less than 100% adherence. A serum ACE activity of greater than 12 U/L gave 91% positive predictive accuracy that the patient was less than 100% adherent with their ACE inhibitor treatment.

Long-Term Kidney Function Concerns:

Recent research suggests a potential increased risk of kidney problems with long-term use of ACE inhibitors, particularly in patients with pre-existing kidney issues. For instance, a study from the University of Virginia School of Medicine raised concerns that long-term use of ACE inhibitors could be contributing to kidney damage. The researchers found that long-term use of drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system, such as ACE inhibitors, was associated with hardened kidney vessels in both lab mice and humans. However, the researchers stressed the importance of continuing to take these medications, as they can be lifesaving for patients, and called for additional studies to better understand the drugs’ long-term effects on the kidneys. In another study, it was found that ACE inhibitor use does not appear to decrease the long-term risk of end-stage renal failure in diabetes. The data suggested instead that ACE inhibitors might actually increase this risk. However, it’s important to note that ACE inhibitors can still benefit people with kidney disease or heart failure, even if they do not have high blood pressure. If high blood pressure is not present, a lower dose may be recommended to prevent low blood pressure symptoms.

Cost-Effectiveness Considerations:

While the availability of generic ACE inhibitors has improved affordability, healthcare systems and payers are increasingly cost-conscious. For instance, many ACE inhibitors are available as lower-cost generics. You can find lisinopril, enalapril, and benazepril for less than $10 at certain pharmacies with a GoodRx discount. All of them are taken by mouth and most are available as low-cost generic options. Most are taken once a day, although some may need to be taken more often (2-3 times per day). In terms of cost-effectiveness, a study found that prescribing ACE inhibitors as antihypertensive first-line therapy in patients without cardiovascular morbidity cannot be recommended at the present time unless the acquisition costs of ACE inhibitors become substantially more attractive. The incremental cost-effectiveness of prescribing ACE inhibitor therapy to everybody was never less than $US100,000 /QALY in the sensitivity analysis. Another study found that ACE inhibitors are a cost-saving treatment compared with placebo in non-diabetic nephropathy, irrespective of ACE (I/D) genotype. However, ACE inhibitors saved more costs and more health gains were achieved in the ACE DD genotype than in the ACE II/ID genotype. Manufacturers need to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of ACE inhibitors compared to newer medications.

Maintaining Physician and Patient Awareness:

With the rise of combination therapies and newer medications, ensuring continued awareness among physicians about the appropriate use of ACE inhibitors is crucial. For instance, a study found that the combination of beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors across the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases showed complementary actions on the sympathetic nervous system and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, two interlinked pathways that influence cardiovascular risk and disease outcomes. This combination therapy continues to provide effective blood pressure lowering and improved cardiovascular outcomes while allowing a greater proportion of patients to rapidly achieve treatment targets. In another study comparing two single-pill dual combination antihypertensive therapies in Chinese patients, the primary outcome, 24-h ambulatory systolic BP reduction, was −13.8 ± 1.2 mmHg in the amlodipine/benazepril group and −12.3 ± 1.2 mmHg in the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide group, with a between-group difference of −1.51 (p = 0.36) mmHg. The between-group differences for major secondary outcomes were −1.47 (p = 0.18) in 24-h diastolic BP, −2.86 (p = 0.13) and −2.74 (p = 0.03) in daytime systolic and diastolic BP, and −0.45 (p = 0.82) and −0.93 (p = 0.44) in nighttime systolic and diastolic BP. Similarly, educating patients about the benefits and potential side effects of these medications is important for informed decision-making.

Market Trends

Focus on Sustainable Practices:

Environmental consciousness is a major trend. Wineries are increasingly opting for cork sourced from sustainably managed forests with certifications like FSC (Forest Stewardship Council). Consumers are also actively seeking out wines with eco-friendly packaging, and natural cork caters to this demand. For instance, environmental consciousness is a major trend in the wine industry. A study found that 58% of regular drinkers worry about climate change and try to minimize their personal impact, while 73% of millennials will try to buy products in recyclable packaging. Another study found that about 35% of regular wine drinkers in the US and 43% in the UK now consider the environmental friendliness of the packaging when purchasing wine.

In terms of cork sourcing, Portugal hosts the largest cork oak forests worldwide and is responsible for almost 50% of the world’s cork production. Hundreds of companies are directly linked to the forest. These companies depend on the cork oak forest in various ways, including cork harvesting, storage, processing, use, ecotourism, and other related fields. Cork trees are harvested every nine or ten years. The trees are not cut down and can be expected to live for 200 years. This makes the industry a near-perfect example of renewable production. Regarding advancements in cork processing and treatment, cork-based adsorbents have been gathering interest from the research community since the 1990s. In the last decade, novel activated carbons and biochars, in multiple applications, have been produced using cork as a raw material. Techniques like microwave pre-treatment and supercritical fluid extraction have been used to improve cork quality and consistency

Hybrid and Composite Corks:

Innovation is leading to the development of hybrid closures that combine natural cork with other materials like plastic or glass. These offer durability, leak-proof properties, and control over oxygen transmission, appealing to wineries seeking modern functionality while maintaining a cork finish. For instance, in the wine bottling process, thermoplastics are commonly used to manufacture the crown of cork stoppers. The production of agglomerated cork stoppers generates a type of waste called cork powder (CoP) in large volumes with known properties but which are still underutilized. At present, although there are many agrocomposites available with additives such as natural fibers or solid residues from agricultural products, there are no studies describing the formation of these agrocomposites from petroleum-derived synthetic plastics combined with cork dust as a reinforcement for the polymeric matrix. In terms of hybrid closures, a winery in the Côtes du Rhône appellation of France, bolsters its cork usage with various types of synthetic closures, in part for environmental reasons. The composite is obtained directly, without the need for grafting, adhesive polymers, or coupling agents. A superior mechanical performance compared to the unprocessed polymer was highlighted in the test results, thus evidencing the reinforcing function played by the waste in the polymer matrix.

Market Challenges Analysis

Quality and Consistency Concerns:

Despite ongoing efforts to minimize it, TCA (cork taint) remains a persistent challenge in the cork industry. This unpleasant odor, caused by the presence of certain compounds in cork, can drastically affect the sensory experience of wine, leading to dissatisfaction among consumers and potential financial losses for wineries. While advancements in cork processing and treatment have significantly reduced the occurrence of TCA taint, the risk still exists, necessitating continued vigilance and investment in quality control measures throughout the supply chain. Natural cork, being a product of nature, exhibits inherent variations in its physical properties such as density, elasticity, and oxygen permeability. These variations can impact the aging process and sensory characteristics of wine, posing challenges for winemakers striving for consistency in their products. While these variations contribute to the unique character of each bottle, they also require wineries to carefully select and manage their cork suppliers to ensure a reliable and high-quality closure for their wines, further underscoring the importance of quality assurance protocols in the cork industry.

Competition from Alternative Closures:

The rise of screw caps as an alternative closure option presents a significant challenge to the dominance of natural cork in the wine industry. With their convenient and user-friendly features, including easy opening and resealing, screw caps are particularly favored for wines intended for early consumption and those targeting markets where convenience is prioritized. This shift in consumer preference towards screw caps has prompted wineries to reconsider their closure choices, weighing the practical advantages of screw caps against the traditional appeal of natural cork. To address concerns about wine oxidation and preserve the freshness of their products, manufacturers of alternative closures such as screw caps have invested in technological advancements. Advanced liners and sealing mechanisms are being developed to provide improved barrier properties, ensuring that the organoleptic qualities of wine are maintained throughout its shelf life. These innovations not only enhance the viability of alternative closures for a broader range of wines but also challenge the perception that screw caps are inferior in quality compared to traditional cork closures, contributing to a dynamic and competitive landscape in the wine closure market.

Market Segmentation Analysis:

By Material:

The Wine Corks Market is segmented by material, offering various options to meet the diverse needs of winemakers and consumers. Plastic cork alternatives provide durability and consistency, appealing to producers aiming for cost-effective and uniform closures. Metal closures, though less common, offer a modern aesthetic and excellent seal integrity, suitable for premium wine brands seeking differentiation. Glass stoppers, while relatively niche, provide an elegant and eco-friendly option, aligning with the sustainability preferences of environmentally conscious consumers. Wood closures, reminiscent of traditional wine stoppers, evoke a sense of authenticity and craftsmanship, often favored by artisanal and small-batch wineries aiming to showcase their artisanal approach.

By Process:

Segmentation by process distinguishes between natural and synthetic cork closures, each offering unique characteristics and benefits. Natural cork closures, derived from cork oak trees, are valued for their traditional charm and ability to allow controlled oxygenation during aging, enhancing the wine’s flavor profile. Synthetic cork alternatives, manufactured from various polymers, offer consistency and reliability, minimizing the risk of cork taint while providing cost-effective solutions for wineries seeking efficient production processes. Both natural and synthetic closures cater to different market segments, reflecting the evolving preferences and priorities of winemakers and consumers in the dynamic Wine Corks Market.

Segments:

Based on Material:

  • Plastic
  • Metal
  • Glass
  • Wood

Based on Process:

  • Natural
  • Synthetic

 Based on Distribution Channel:

  • Offline
  • Online

Based on the Geography:

  • North America
    • The U.S.
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • The U.K.
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • South-east Asia
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • Latin America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of Latin America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • GCC Countries
    • South Africa
    • Rest of the Middle East and Africa

Regional Analysis

North America

North America follows closely behind, with a market share of around 25%. The United States, in particular, has been a significant contributor to the regional market, driven by its sizeable wine production and consumption. However, the adoption of alternative closures, such as screwcaps and synthetic corks, has gained momentum in this region, partly due to their perceived convenience and consistency. Nevertheless, the premium wine segment in North America continues to favor natural cork closures, maintaining a stable demand for wine corks.

Europe

Europe currently holds the largest market share, accounting for approximately 45% of the global wine corks market. The region’s rich winemaking heritage, the presence of renowned wine-producing countries like France, Italy, and Spain, and the enduring preference for natural cork closures among many traditional wineries have contributed to its dominance. The European market’s emphasis on quality, tradition, and the perception of cork as a premium closure option has sustained the demand for wine corks, despite the introduction of alternative closures.

Key Player Analysis

  1. Jelinek Cork Group
  2. Widgetco, Inc.
  3. Amorim Cork Composites S.A
  4. Bangor Cork Inc.,
  5. Sugherificio Martinese e Figli Srl
  6. M.A. Silva USA, LLC
  7. Lambert
  8. Diam Bouchage designs
  9. Work inc
  10. J. C. Ribeiro, S. A.

Competitive Analysis

In the competitive landscape of the Wine Corks Market, several leading players vie for market share and prominence. Amorim Cork Composites S.A stands out as a global leader, renowned for its commitment to sustainable practices and innovative cork solutions. Jelinek Cork Group, with its extensive range of cork products and international presence, remains a formidable competitor. Diam Bouchage designs has carved a niche with its technological advancements in cork closures, offering solutions to mitigate TCA taint and ensure wine preservation. M.A. Silva USA, LLC distinguishes itself with its focus on premium cork products and personalized services, catering to the high-end segment of the market. Widgetco, Inc. boasts a diverse portfolio of cork products and accessories, catering to various industries beyond wine. These key players, along with Bangor Cork Inc., Sugherificio Martinese e Figli Srl, Lambert, Work inc, and J. C. Ribeiro, S. A., contribute to a dynamic and competitive market landscape, driving innovation and meeting the diverse needs of winemakers and consumers alike.

Recent Developments

In February 2023, The American wine closure company Pulltex acquired the Spanish cork producer J. Herminio Ramos. This acquisition will give Pulltex access to J. Herminio Ramos’s high-quality cork and cork processing capabilities.

In March 2023, The Portuguese cork producer Amorim & Irmãos acquired the American cork producer Nomacorc. This acquisition will strengthen Amorim’s position in the wine cork market and give it access to Nomacorc’s innovative cork products.

In December 2022, The French cork producer Diam Bouchage partnered with the American wine closure company Oeneo to develop new sustainable cork products. This partnership will combine Diam Bouchage’s expertise in wine cork production with Oeneo’s expertise in sustainable packaging solutions.

In August 2022, Waterloo Container announced the renewal of its agreement with Amcor Flexibles Capsules, a leading distributor of the STELVIN® brand wine closure. This renewed partnership with Amcor allowed Waterloo Container to grow as a premier packaging provider in the wine sector.

Market Concentration & Characteristics

Market concentration in the Wine Corks Market is notable for its diverse landscape, characterized by a mix of established players and emerging contenders. While a few major cork manufacturers dominate the global market, smaller regional players also contribute significantly, especially in traditional wine-producing regions. This dynamic reflects the industry’s inherent complexity, where factors such as geographic preferences, sustainability practices, and technological innovation influence market share and competitiveness. Furthermore, market characteristics underscore the importance of quality, reliability, and sustainability in cork production. Leading companies prioritize sustainable sourcing practices, invest in technological advancements to ensure product quality and consistency, and tailor their offerings to meet the evolving needs of winemakers and consumers. As the market continues to evolve, strategic partnerships, mergers, and acquisitions are expected to shape its landscape, driving further consolidation and competition among key players.

Report Coverage

The research report offers an in-depth analysis based on Material, Process, Distribution Channel, and Geography. It details leading market players, providing an overview of their business, product offerings, investments, revenue streams, and key applications. Additionally, the report includes insights into the competitive environment, SWOT analysis, current market trends, as well as the primary drivers and constraints. Furthermore, it discusses various factors that have driven market expansion in recent years. The report also explores market dynamics, regulatory scenarios, and technological advancements that are shaping the industry. It assesses the impact of external factors and global economic changes on market growth. Lastly, it provides strategic recommendations for new entrants and established companies to navigate the complexities of the market.

Shape Your Report to Specific Countries or Regions & Enjoy 30% Off!

Future Outlook

  1. Continued Growth: The Wine Corks Market is expected to witness steady growth driven by increasing wine consumption worldwide.
  2. Sustainability Focus: Emphasis on sustainable cork production methods and eco-friendly packaging solutions will shape market dynamics.
  3. Technological Advancements: Ongoing innovations in cork processing techniques will enhance quality and minimize the risk of cork taint.
  4. Market Expansion: Emerging wine markets in regions like Asia Pacific will present new opportunities for market expansion.
  5. Premiumization Trend: Growing demand for premium wines will fuel the need for high-quality cork closures.
  6. Competition from Alternatives: Alternative closures such as screw caps will continue to challenge the dominance of traditional cork closures.
  7. Regulatory Considerations: Compliance with evolving regulations and standards regarding cork sourcing and production will be crucial.
  8. Consumer Preferences: Changing consumer preferences, including a preference for convenience, will influence cork closure choices.
  9. Geographic Variations: Market dynamics will vary across regions, influenced by cultural preferences and wine production trends.
  10. Industry Collaboration: Collaboration among stakeholders, including cork producers, wineries, and regulatory bodies, will drive innovation and sustainability initiatives.

1. Introduction
1.1. Report Description
1.2. Purpose of the Report
1.3. USP & Key Offerings
1.4. Key Benefits for Stakeholders
1.5. Target Audience
1.6. Report Scope
1.7. Regional Scope
2. Scope and Methodology
2.1. Objectives of the Study
2.2. Stakeholders
2.3. Data Sources
2.3.1. Primary Sources
2.3.2. Secondary Sources
2.4. Market Estimation
2.4.1. Bottom-Up Approach
2.4.2. Top-Down Approach
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Introduction
4.1. Overview
4.2. Key Industry Trends
5. Wine Corks Market
5.1. Market Overview
5.2. Market Performance
5.3. Impact of COVID-19
5.4. Market Forecast
6. Market Breakup by Material
6.1. Plastic
6.1.1. Market Trends
6.1.2. Market Forecast
6.1.3. Revenue Share
6.1.4. Revenue Growth Opportunity
6.2. Metal
6.2.1. Market Trends
6.2.2. Market Forecast
6.2.3. Revenue Share
6.2.4. Revenue Growth Opportunity
6.3. Glass
6.3.1. Market Trends
6.3.2. Market Forecast
6.3.3. Revenue Share
6.3.4. Revenue Growth Opportunity
6.4. Wood
6.4.1. Market Trends
6.4.2. Market Forecast
6.4.3. Revenue Share
6.4.4. Revenue Growth Opportunity
7. Market Breakup by Process
7.1. Natural
7.1.1. Market Trends
7.1.2. Market Forecast
7.1.3. Revenue Share
7.1.4. Revenue Growth Opportunity
7.2. Synthetic
7.2.1. Market Trends
7.2.2. Market Forecast
7.2.3. Revenue Share
7.2.4. Revenue Growth Opportunity
8. Market Breakup by Distribution Channel
8.1. Offline
8.1.1. Market Trends
8.1.2. Market Forecast
8.1.3. Revenue Share
8.1.4. Revenue Growth Opportunity
8.2. Online
8.2.1. Market Trends
8.2.2. Market Forecast
8.2.3. Revenue Share
8.2.4. Revenue Growth Opportunity
9. Market Breakup by Region
9.1. North America
9.1.1. United States
9.1.1.1. Market Trends
9.1.1.2. Market Forecast
9.1.2. Canada
9.1.2.1. Market Trends
9.1.2.2. Market Forecast
9.2. Asia-Pacific
9.2.1. China
9.2.2. Japan
9.2.3. India
9.2.4. South Korea
9.2.5. Australia
9.2.6. Indonesia
9.2.7. Others
9.3. Europe
9.3.1. Germany
9.3.2. France
9.3.3. United Kingdom
9.3.4. Italy
9.3.5. Spain
9.3.6. Russia
9.3.7. Others
9.4. Latin America
9.4.1. Brazil
9.4.2. Mexico
9.4.3. Others
9.5. Middle East and Africa
9.5.1. Market Trends
9.5.2. Market Breakup by Country
9.5.3. Market Forecast
10. SWOT Analysis
10.1. Overview
10.2. Strengths
10.3. Weaknesses
10.4. Opportunities
10.5. Threats
11. Value Chain Analysis
12. Porters Five Forces Analysis
12.1. Overview
12.2. Bargaining Power of Buyers
12.3. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
12.4. Degree of Competition
12.5. Threat of New Entrants
12.6. Threat of Substitutes
13. Price Analysis
14. Competitive Landscape
14.1. Market Structure
14.2. Key Players
14.3. Profiles of Key Players
14.3.1. Jelinek Cork Group
14.3.1.1. Company Overview
14.3.1.2. Product Portfolio
14.3.1.3. Financials
14.3.1.4. SWOT Analysis
14.3.2. Widgetco, Inc.
14.3.3. Amorim Cork Composites S.A
14.3.4. Bangor Cork Inc.,
14.3.5. Sugherificio Martinese e Figli Srl
14.3.6. M.A. Silva USA, LLC
14.3.7. Lambert
14.3.8. Diam Bouchage designs
14.3.9. Work inc
14.3.10. J. C. Ribeiro, S. A.
15. Research Methodology

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is the current size of the Wine Corks Market?

The Wine Corks Market is projected to grow from USD 6864.8 million in 2024 to USD 11193.48 million by 2032.

What factors are driving the growth of the Wine Corks Market?

Key drivers include increasing wine consumption globally, rising environmental awareness leading to a preference for natural cork, advancements in cork technology, and a shift towards sustainable packaging solutions.

What are the key segments within the Wine Corks Market?

The market is segmented by material (plastic, metal, glass, wood), process (natural, synthetic), and distribution channel (offline and online).

What are some challenges faced by the Wine Corks Market?

Challenges include quality and consistency concerns, competition from alternative closures like screw caps, and the need to navigate a complex regulatory landscape.

Who are the major players in the Wine Corks Market?

Major players include Amorim Cork, Nomacorc LLC, Cork Supply Group, Vinventions, and Trefinos.

Europe Scaffolding Market

Published:
Report ID: 37824

Night Cream Market

Published:
Report ID: 37619

Pod Vapes arket

Published:
Report ID: 37623

Microfinance Market

Published:
Report ID: 37630

Makeup Remover Market

Published:
Report ID: 37626

Indoor Farming Market

Published:
Report ID: 37634

Eco-friendly Furniture Market

Published:
Report ID: 37489

Electric Guitars Market

Published:
Report ID: 37121

United Kingdom Toothpaste Tablet Market

Published:
Report ID: 36979

Electronic Cigarettes Market

Published:
Report ID: 36948

Soy Protein Ingredients Market

Published:
Report ID: 9445

Bag in Box Market

Published:
Report ID: 2124

Purchase Options

$2999
Delivery Format: Excel.
$4999
Designed for the individual purchaser.
$6999
Users located at a single corporate site or regional office.
$7999
Allowed for unlimited sharing globally within one company.
Smallform of Sample request

Have a question?

User Profile

Don’t settle for less – trust Mitul to help you find the best solution.

Report delivery within 24 to 48 hours

– Other Info –

What people say?-

User Review

I am very impressed with the information in this report. The author clearly did their research when they came up with this product and it has already given me a lot of ideas.

Jana Schmidt
CEDAR CX Technologies

– Connect with us –

Phone

+91 6232 49 3207


support

24/7 Research Support


sales@credenceresearch.com

– Research Methodology –

Going beyond the basics: advanced techniques in research methodology

– Trusted By –

Pepshi, LG, Nestle
Motorola, Honeywell, Johnson and johnson
LG Chem, SIEMENS, Pfizer
Unilever, Samsonite, QIAGEN