Medical Devices
Home » Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market

Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market

Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market By Type (Portable Devices, Cart-based Devices), By Technology (Laser Doppler, Photoplethysmography, Ultrasound), By End-user (Hospitals & Ambulatory Surgery Centers, Diagnostic Centers, Others) Market – Growth, Future Prospects & Competitive Analysis, 2018 – 2026
Report Book

Published Date: April 2019
Category: Medical Devices
Report ID: 59658
Report Format: PDF
No of Pages: 190

Rating: Credence Reports

Industry Outlook

Measurement of skin perfusion pressure refers to a noninvasive test used in the assessment of peripheral arterial diseases, particularly in the determination of the optimal extent of amputation and the assessment of ischemia. Skin perfusion pressure reflects the status of the more proximal arterial system and is not interfered with by arterial wall calcification. Lesions on the toes or the previous digital amputation site may also preclude the measurement of pressure. Measurement of skin perfusion pressure is not limited to such challenges and is useful in the analysis of the severity of peripheral arterial diseases.

Market Synopsis

Laser Doppler technology to lead the global market

There are three prime techniques used for the measurement of skin perfusion pressure (SPP): laser Doppler, photoplethysmography, and ultrasound. Laser Doppler technology is most commonly used in SPP. A pressure reading is obtained by placing a Laser Doppler sensor in close proximity to the affected area with temporary adhesive. As opposed to photoplethysmography, which detects the intensity of the scattered light from the red blood cells, laser Doppler reads the pressure with the shift in Doppler frequency generated by the movements of the red cells. The patient is positioned supine for this procedure, with the blood pressure cuff wrapped around the sensor on the desired area and inflated thereon. The return of the microcirculatory flow is marked by the doubling of volume, a measure of the percentage of the red blood cells moving in the area in comparison to the occlusion baseline. Laser Doppler devices are also more accurate, have higher sensitivity, and have a reduced signal-to-noise ratio.

Cart-based devices appear to be in the highest demand in global markets. Better precision and an early introduction advantage have put this segment in a dominant position. The manufacturers of skin perfusion pressure testing devices have also increased their focus on developing the latest generation of equipment with enhanced features such as free flap monitoring devices, internet and device connectivity for seamless data transmission between departments, and enhanced data recording. New-generation devices are experiencing renewed market demand as these can be efficiently used for supporting noninvasive vascular diagnosis in the upper and lower extremities alike.

Hospitals will remain the largest end-user of skin perfusion pressure testing devices.

Hospitals are the clear leader in the global skin perfusion pressure testing devices market due to greater device uptake. Hospitals have a greater application base for SPP devices due to the higher patient footfall seeking treatment for peripheral arterial diseases and ischemic complications. Increasing cases of peripheral artery diseases are a prime factor driving the market for skin perfusion pressure testing devices. The uptake of cart-based devices is anticipated to be high in hospital segments due to the better affordability of these systems in hospitals. Furthermore, portable alternatives will be in high demand from diagnostic centers and other smaller settings. Further technological advancements in portable devices will increase their demand in hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers.

North America and Europe will continue to dominate the global market for skin perfusion pressure testing.

Based on geographical demarcation, the global market for skin perfusion pressure testing devices is cumulative for North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East and Africa. North America will continue to dominate the global market in terms of revenue as well as volume uptake of SPP devices, closely followed by Europe. The easy availability of advanced devices and their swift adoption due to greater awareness are mainly attributed to the larger market shares of North America and Europe. Furthermore, these regions are also characterized by a high prevalence of peripheral vascular diseases. Additionally, Asia Pacific shall witness rapid growth during the forecast period, surpassing the global benchmark. Growing awareness and the recent introduction of the major market players in this space will be the key growth facilitators for the Asia Pacific market.

Periods of History and Forecast

This research report presents the analysis of each considered segment for the period from 2016 to 2026, using 2017 as the base year for estimations. Compounded annual growth rates (CAGRs) for each segment are calculated for the forecast period from 2018 to 2026.

Report Scope by Segments

The skin perfusion pressure testing devices market report provides a quantitative assessment of the industry in terms of current and forecasted market size while also presenting the market dynamics. This market is segmented on types, technologies, end-users, and geography.

This report also includes a company profiles section that gives insights into the company overview, product portfolio, financial information, and key developments of major market players. The major players profiled in this report include Moor Instruments Limited, CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC, Vasamed Incorporated, Perimed AB, Promed Group Co., Ltd., Viasonix, ADInstruments, ELCAT GmbH, and Koven Technology, Inc.

Key questions are answered in this report.

  • The historical and projected size of the global skin perfusion pressure testing devices market during the period from 2016 to 2026
  • The estimated compounded annual growth rate at which the global market is anticipated during the forecast period from 2018 to 2026
  • Which are the key market dynamic elements determining the global market trends for skin perfusion pressure testing devices?
  • Which are the major areas with potential for growth?
  • Which product type is anticipated to reign supreme over the global skin perfusion pressure testing devices market?
  • Will demand these devices increase in Asia Pacific and Latin America’s emerging economies?

Chapter 1. Preface
1.1. Report Description
1.1.1. Study Purpose
1.1.2. Target Audience
1.1.3. USP and Key Offerings
1.2. Research Scope
1.3. Research Methodology
1.3.1. Phase I – Secondary Research
1.3.2. Phase II – Primary Research
1.3.3. Approach Adopted
1.3.4. Top Down Approach
1.3.5. Bottom Up Approach
1.3.6. Phase III – Expert Panel Review
1.3.7. Assumptions
1.4. Market Segmentation

Chapter 2. Executive Summary
2.1. Global SPPTD Market Portraiture
2.2. Global SPPTD Market, by Type, 2017 (US$ Mn)
2.3. Global SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2017 (US$ Mn)
2.4. Global SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2017 (US$ Mn)
2.5. Global SPPTD Market, by Geography, 2017 (US$ Mn)

Chapter 3. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices (SPPTD) Market: Dynamics and Future Outlook
3.1. Overview
3.2. Drivers
3.3. Challenges
3.4. Opportunities
3.5. Attractive Investment Proposition, by Geography, 2017
3.6. Competitive Analysis: Global SPPTD Market, by Key Players, 2017

Chapter 4. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices (SPPTD) Market, by Type, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
4.1. Overview
4.2. Portable Devices
4.3. Cart-based Devices

Chapter 5. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices (SPPTD) Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
5.1. Overview
5.2. Laser Doppler
5.3. Photoplethysmography
5.4. Ultrasound

Chapter 6. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices (SPPTD) Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
6.1. Overview
6.2. Hospitals & Ambulatory Surgery Centers
6.3. Diagnostic Centers
6.4. Others

Chapter 7. Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices (SPPTD) Market, by Geography, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.1. Overview
7.2. North America SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.2.1. North America SPPTD Market, by Type, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.2.2. North America SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.2.3. North America SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.2.4. North America SPPTD Market, by Country, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.2.4.1. U.S.
7.2.4.2. Canada
7.3. Europe SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.3.1. Europe SPPTD Market, by Type, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.3.2. Europe SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.1.1. Europe SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.1.2. Europe SPPTD Market, by Country/Region, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.1.2.1. U.K.
7.1.2.2. Germany
7.1.2.3. France
7.1.2.4. Rest of Europe
7.2. Asia Pacific SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.2.1. Asia Pacific SPPTD Market, by Type, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.2.2. Asia Pacific SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.2.3. Asia Pacific SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.2.4. Asia Pacific SPPTD Market, by Country/Region, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.2.4.1. China
7.2.4.2. Japan
7.2.4.3. Australia
7.2.4.4. Rest of Asia Pacific
7.3. Latin America SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.3.1. Latin America SPPTD Market, by Type, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.3.2. Latin America SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.3.3. Latin America SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.3.4. Latin America SPPTD Market, by Country/Region, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.3.4.1. Brazil
7.3.4.2. Mexico
7.3.4.3. Rest of Latin America
7.4. Middle East & Africa SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.4.1. Middle East & Africa SPPTD Market, by Type, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.4.2. Middle East & Africa SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.4.3. Middle East & Africa SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.4.4. Middle East & Africa SPPTD Market, by Region, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
7.4.4.1. GCC
7.4.4.2. South Africa
7.4.4.3. Rest of Middle East & Africa

Chapter 8. Company Profiles
8.1. Moor Instruments Limited
8.1.1. Company Overview
8.1.2. Financial Information (Subject to Data Availability)
8.1.3. Product Portfolio
8.1.4. Key Developments
8.2. CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC
8.3. Vasamed Incorporated
8.4. Perimed AB
8.5. Promed Group Co., Ltd.
8.6. Viasonix
8.7. ADInstruments
8.8. ELCAT GmbH
8.9. Koven Technology, Inc.

List of Figures

FIG 1. Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices (SPPTD) Market: Research Methodology
FIG 2. Market Size Estimation – Top Down & Bottom up Approach
FIG 3. SPPTD: Market Segmentation
FIG 4. Global SPPTD Market, by Type, 2017 (US$ Mn)
FIG 5. Global SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2017 (US$ Mn)
FIG 6. Global SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2017 (US$ Mn)
FIG 7. Global SPPTD Market, by Geography, 2017 (US$ Mn)
FIG 8. Attractive Investment Proposition, by Geography, 2017
FIG 9. Competitive Analysis: Global SPPTD Market, by Key Players, 2017
FIG 10. Global Portable SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 11. Global Cart-based SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 12. Global Laser Doppler SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 13. Global Photoplethysmography SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 14. Global Ultrasound SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 15. Global SPPTD Market for Hospitals & Ambulatory Surgery Centers, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 16. Global SPPTD Market for Diagnostic Centers, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 17. Global SPPTD Market for Other End-users, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 18. U.S. SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 19. Canada SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 20. U.K. SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 21. Germany SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 22. France SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 23. Rest of Europe SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 24. China SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 25. Japan SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 26. Australia SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 27. Rest of Asia Pacific SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 28. Brazil SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 29. Mexico SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 30. Rest of Latin America SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 31. GCC SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 32. South Africa SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
FIG 33. Rest of Middle East and Africa SPPTD Market, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)

List of Tables

TABLE 1 Global Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices (SPPTD) Market Portraiture
TABLE 2 Global SPPTD Market, by Type, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 3 Global SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 4 Global SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 5 Global SPPTD Market, by Geography, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 6 North America SPPTD Market, by Type, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 7 North America SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 8 North America SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 9 North America SPPTD Market, by Country, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 10 Europe SPPTD Market, by Type, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 11 Europe SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 12 Europe SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 13 Europe SPPTD Market, by Country/Region, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 14 Asia Pacific SPPTD Market, by Type, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 15 Asia Pacific SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 16 Asia Pacific SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 17 Asia Pacific SPPTD Market, by Country/Region, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 18 Latin America SPPTD Market, by Type, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 19 Latin America SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 20 Latin America SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 21 Latin America SPPTD Market, by Country/Region, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 22 Middle East and Africa SPPTD Market, by Type, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 23 Middle East and Africa SPPTD Market, by Technology, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 24 Middle East and Africa SPPTD Market, by End-user, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 25 Middle East and Africa SPPTD Market, by Region, 2016 – 2026 (US$ Mn)
TABLE 26 Moor Instruments Limited: Company Snapshot (Company Overview; Financial Information; Product Portfolio; Key Developments)
TABLE 27 CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC: Company Snapshot (Company Overview; Financial Information; Product Portfolio; Key Developments)
TABLE 28 Vasamed Incorporated: Company Snapshot (Company Overview; Financial Information; Product Portfolio; Key Developments)
TABLE 29 Perimed AB: Company Snapshot (Company Overview; Financial Information; Product Portfolio; Key Developments)
TABLE 30 Promed Group Co., Ltd.: Company Snapshot (Company Overview; Financial Information; Product Portfolio; Key Developments)
TABLE 31 Viasonix: Company Snapshot (Company Overview; Financial Information; Product Portfolio; Key Developments)
TABLE 32 ADInstruments: Company Snapshot (Company Overview; Financial Information; Product Portfolio; Key Developments)
TABLE 33 ELCAT GmbH: Company Snapshot (Company Overview; Financial Information; Product Portfolio; Key Developments)
TABLE 34 Koven Technology, Inc.: Company Snapshot (Company Overview; Financial Information; Product Portfolio; Key Developments)

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is the size of Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market?

The market for Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market is expected to reach US$ XX Mn by 2026.

What is the Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market CAGR?

The Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market is expected to see significant CAGR growth over the coming years, at XX%.

What is the Forecast period considered for Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market?

The report is forecasted from 2018-2026.

What is the base year considered for Skin Perfusion Pressure Testing Devices Market?

The base year of this report is 2017.

Who are the major players in this market?

CorVascular Diagnostics, LLC, Vasamed Incorporated, Perimed AB, Promed Group Co., Ltd., Viasonix, ADInstruments, ELCAT GmbH are some of the major players in the global market.

Download Sample Report

Have a question?

Market Research Analyst

Don’t settle for less – trust Ishika to help you find the best solution.

– Other Info –

What people say?-

User Review

I am very impressed with the information in this report. The author clearly did their research when they came up with this product and it has already given me a lot of ideas.

Jana Schmidt
CEDAR CX Technologies

– Connect with us –

Phone

+91 8085 89 5002


support

24/7 Research Support


sales@credenceresearch.com

– Research Methodology –

Going beyond the basics: advanced techniques in research methodology

– Trusted By –

Pepshi, LG, Nestle
Motorola, Honeywell, Johnson and johnson
LG Chem, SIEMENS, Pfizer
Unilever, Samsonite, QIAGEN