Home / Chemicals / Sulfur Recovery Technology Market By Technology (Claus Process, Tail Gas Treatment, Others), By Source Of Recovery (Oil & Gas, Other), By Capacity (‘Up To 100 t/d’, 101-200 t/d (tons per day), 201-300 t/d (Tons Per Day), ‘Above 300 t/d’ (Tons Per Day)) - Growth, Future Prospects & Competitive Analysis, 2018 – 2026

Sulfur Recovery Technology Market By Technology (Claus Process, Tail Gas Treatment, Others), By Source Of Recovery (Oil & Gas, Other), By Capacity (‘Up To 100 t/d’, 101-200 t/d (tons per day), 201-300 t/d (Tons Per Day), ‘Above 300 t/d’ (Tons Per Day)) - Growth, Future Prospects & Competitive Analysis, 2018 – 2026

Published: Sep 2018 | Report Code: 59299-09-18

Industry Outlook

Sulfur Recovery Technology Market is expected to reach US$ 3,402.3 Mn by 2026 with 9.0% CAGR during the forecast period from 2018 to 2026. In 2017, Asia Pacific led the Sulfur Recovery Technology Market and is estimated to be the fastest growing region between 2018 and 2026.

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has its presence in a number of gaseous waste streams from oil refineries, natural gas plants and wastewater treatment among other processes. These streams usually contain sulfur, water vapor, carbon dioxide, trace quantities of hydrocarbons and ammonia. Waste gases with ammonia and sulfur are termed as sour gases, whereas those without the presence of ammonia are referred to as acid gases. These waste streams are used to recover sulfur just before flaring them. Sulfur recovery from sour or acid gas involves application of the Claus Process using the reaction between hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide (produced in the Claus Process furnace from the combustion of H2S with air and/or oxygen). This reaction yields elemental sulfur and water vapor. The conventional sulfur recovery process (Claus Thermal Stage and Claus Catalytic Stage) is based upon the extraction of sulfur by in-situ condensation within the Claus Reactor. The laws pertaining to air pollution are stringent. Based on these laws lower grade fuel is required to be refined with minimum sulfur concentration. This is one of the prime factors which is expected to drive the global Sulfur Recovery Technology Market.

Some of the major advancements in the Claus Process to achieve up to 99.99% of sulfur recovery are: application of absorptive water separation process in the catalytic reactor stage, cold bed absorption (CBD) process applied at low temperatures (below sulfur dew point temperature) to achieve 97-99.5% sulfur recovery and the modified Claus Process with tail gas clean up unit (TGCU) used for very high sulfur recovery as per necessity. With these advancements, the overall sulfur recovery of up to 99.5 to 99.9% is possible.

Market Synopsis, Value (US$ Mn)

Sulfur Recovery Technology Market

Get a sample copy for more information

"Claus Process Technology Segment dominated the Sulfur Recovery Technology Market"

The SRU’s are used to derive elemental sulfur from the oil and gas refining. H₂S is combusted in the ‘Reaction Furnace’ to form SO₂. The H₂S and SO₂ then react at an approximate ratio of 2:1 (2 parts of H₂S and 1 part of SO₂) to form elemental Sulfur in the Claus Reactors. After each catalytic stage, liquid sulfur is recovered in various Claus Condensers. The remaining unreacted SO₂ and H₂S is then passed to the next stage, in which the equilibrium-limited Claus reaction basically continues with the presence of Claus catalyst. These tail gases are further processed to recover remaining sulfur by a process called as tail gas processing or tail gas incineration. Incineration is an oxidation process to convert SOx in to elemental sulfur. Trend shows that a two-bed catalytic claus plant can attain 94% to 96% efficiency. Range of recoveries varies from 96% to 97.5% for three-bed catalytic plant whereas range from 97% to 98.5% for a four-bed catalytic plant. At normal pressures and operating temperatures, the Claus reaction is basically thermodynamically limited to the range between 97% to 98% recovery. Tail gas from the Claus plant still contains 0.8% to 1.5% sulfur compounds. The Claus Process is the primary method of sulfur recovery. Before the Paris Agreement on Climate Change which concluded in December 2015, most of the refineries globally had infrastructure with single stage Claus plant for sulfur recovery. This is capable of recovering up to 92% of sulfur depending on the internal processes involved. With stricter environmental regulations now in place, there is a requirement of single stage Claus plants to expand into corresponding multi-stage plants. All this capacity expansion is to achieve 99.5-99.90% of sulfur recovery from the feed stream.

Sulfur Recovery Technology Market

Get a sample copy for more information

"Oil and Gas Identified as the Dominant Source of Recovery Segment in 2017"

Sulfur is mainly recovered from crude oil and natural gas processing. Sulfur recovery from oil & gas market is witnessing the upward swing as it is the largest source of sulfur and is expected to maintain its dominance throughout the forecast period. With an objective to minimize sulfur concentrations in various refined products, sulfur is basically recovered during refining operations with the help of various technologies. Low concentrations of sulfur that finds application in fuel gases are compulsory to comply with emission standards for process boilers, heaters, and flue gases. Environmental pressure for reducing the sulfur emission is also contributing to the market growth of sulfur recovery technology in oil & gas industry. For instance, to meet U.S. environmental standards for sulfur emission, 99.8% of sulfur must be recovered from natural gas processing. Claus Process and tail gas treating processes are the most preferred process to achieve the aforementioned recovery levels.

Sulfur Recovery Technology Market

Get a sample copy for more information

"‘Up to 100 t/d’ (tons per day) Expected to be the Largest Capacity Segment in 2017"

The SRU’s in the refineries have sulfur recovery/removal capacity of 5 t/d to 60 t/d. These refineries are equipped with single stage Claus Process for recovery/removal of sulfur from the feed stream. ‘Up to 100 t/d’ recovery of sulfur falls under this segment. The smaller capacity sulfur recovery plants generally require additional space for accommodation of separate plants to meet the existing mandate of nearly 99.90% sulfur free output. These plants may incur a lot of interruptions in the existing facility and least interruption in sulfur recovery process is what is desired in sulfur recovery plants

Sulfur Recovery Technology Market

"Asia Pacific is the Largest Region in the Global Sulfur Recovery Technology Market"

Asia Pacific is the most attractive market because of healthy growth rate and increasing environmental concerns and government regulations in the region. High growth potential for the development of sulfur recovery technology is observed in economies such as India, China, Malaysia, South Korea and Indonesia. China and India are the largest markets for sulfur recovery technology in the Asia Pacific region, collectively contributing more than half of the regional demand. In 2017, China alone accounted for major market share of the regional demand of sulfur recovery technology market. In 2016, the average gravity of crude oil processed in the region is projected to decrease from 35.9 °API (The American Petroleum Institute gravity) to 35.4 °API in 2035 and corresponding sulfur content will increase from 1.02 wt% to 1.40 wt% in 2035. North America was the second largest market for sulfur recovery technology in 2017 and is expected to maintain its position throughout the forecast period. Increasing concern about the sulfur content in processed fuels and natural gas is leading to tighter regulation and more stringent standards for sulfur emission from processing facilities in North America. The presence of large multinationals is making sulfur recovery systems more accessible to the end-users. Moreover, the launch of new technologies and systems with higher percentage of recovery is stimulating the market growth.

Sulfur Recovery Technology Market

"Mergers and Acquisitions are the Key Strategies Adopted by the manufacturers" 

Key players operating in the global sulfur recovery technology market includes Royal Dutch Shell, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Exxon Mobil, The Linde Group, Chiyoda Corporation, and John Wood Group Plc. On 1st March 2016, Fluor Corp. acquired the Netherland based Stork Holding B.V. which is a global provider of modification, maintenance and asset integrity services. Through this, Fluor can strengthen its market position in geographies such as U.K, Continental Europe, the Middle East, Asia-Pacific and the Americas. On 9th October, 2017, John Wood Group PLC which is a global leader in delivery of engineering, project and technical services to industrial and energy markets acquired Amec foster Wheeler.

Sulfur Recovery Technology Market

Historical & Forecast Period

This research considers 2017 as the base year and presents analysis of segments from 2016 to 2026. In addition, forecast period from 2018 to 2026 is considered for Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) calculation for each respective segment.

Report Scope by Segments

Sulfur Recovery Technology Market report represents understanding about the current market dynamics and strategies. It also focuses on quantitative and qualitative analysis of the overall market. The report covers the global sulfur recovery technology market by categorizing the market in terms of technology, source of recovery, capacity and geography. Publishing this broad research report aims to aid the sulfur recovery technology market stakeholders and professionals in assisting strategic initiatives and decisions in the sulfur recovery technology market.

ATTRIBUTE DETAILS
Research Period  2016-2026
Base Year 2017
Forecast Period  2018-2026
Historical Year  2016
Unit  USD Million
Segmentation

 Technology Segment (2016–2026; US$ Mn)
 • Claus Process
 • Tail Gas Treatment
 • Others (Tail Gas Incineration, Liquid Redox Sulfur Removal & Recovery Combustion Gas SOx Removal, etc.)

 Source of Recovery Segment (2016–2026; US$ Mn)
 • Oil and Gas
 • Others (Sulfur Mining, Coal Gasification, etc.)

 Capacity Segment (2016–2026; US$ Mn)
 • Up-to 100 t/d
 • 101-200 t/d
 • 201-300 t/d
 • Above 300 t/d

 Geography Segment (2016–2026; US$ Mn)
 • North America (United States and Canada)
 • Europe (U.K., Germany, Italy, Spain, France, Rest of Europe)
 • Asia Pacific (China, India, Japan, Rest of Asia Pacific)
 • Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Rest of Latin America)
 • Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, Rest of MEA)

This research report describes leading continents and their major countries, along with profiles of key players operating in overall market and their planned developments. Our report further defines the overall market dynamics such as drivers, challenges, and opportunities prevalent in the market to understand global elastomers market more explicitly. Our in-depth quantitative and quantitative analysis of each segment up to country level highlights revenue pockets and investment opportunities in the market.

Key questions answered in this report

  • Who are the distributors, traders and dealers of sulfur recovery technology Market?
  • What are expected largest technology, source of recovery and capacity segments in the market during the forecast period from 2018 to 2026?
  • What are the fastest growing segments in the market for the forecast period?
  • What are the current market trends in the sulfur recovery technology market and valuable opportunities for the players?
  • How the regulatory framework affects the global as well as the regional markets?
  • Which are the key players operating in the global market and what are the strategies adopted by them?
  • What are sales, revenue, business strategy and product portfolio of top manufacturers of sulfur recovery technology market?
  • What is the market size and trend in emerging and developed markets?

Chapter 1 Preface 15
1.1 Report Description 15
1.1.1 Purpose of the Report 15
1.1.2 Target Audience 15
1.1.3 USP and Key Offerings 15
1.2 Research Scope 16
1.3 Research Methodology 17
1.3.1 Phase I – Secondary Research 17
1.3.2 Phase II – Primary Research 18
1.3.3 Top Down & Bottom Up Approach 18
1.3.3.1 Top-Down Approach 18
1.3.3.2 Bottom-Up Approach 19
1.3.4 Phase III – Expert Panel Review 19
1.3.5 Assumptions 19
1.4 Market Segmentation 21

Chapter 2 Executive Summary 22
2.1 Overview 22
2.2 Market Snapshot: Global SRT Market 23
2.3 Global SRT Market Value, by Technology, 2017 (US$ Mn) 24
2.4 Global SRT Market Value, by Source of Recovery, 2017 (US$ Mn) 25
2.5 Global SRT Market Value, by Capacity, 2017 (US$ Mn) 26
2.6 Global SRT Market Value, by Geography, 2017 (US$ Mn) 27

Chapter 3 Market Overview 28
3.1 Introduction 28
3.2 Market Dynamics 30
3.2.1 Market Drivers 30
3.2.1.1 Stringent Environmental Regulations for Sulfur Emission 30
3.2.1.2 Adoption of Advanced in Sulfur Recovery Technologies, in Oil and Gas Sector 32
3.2.2 Challenges 32
3.2.2.1 High Operational Expenditure Associated with Multistage Claus Process 32
3.2.3 Opportunities 33
3.2.3.1 Refineries are Adopting Specialized Tail Gas Treatment Recovery Process 33
3.2.3.2 Growing Demand for Sulfur among End-Application Industries 33
3.3 Impact Analysis of Drivers, Challenges and Opportunities During the Forecast Period 34
3.4 Attractive Investment Proposition, by Geography, 2016 35
3.5 Market Positioning of Key Players 36

Chapter 4 Global Sulfur Recovery Technology (SRT) Market, by Technology 37
4.1 Overview 37
4.1.1 Global SRT Market Value, by Technology, 2017 & 2026 (Share, %) 38
4.2 Claus Process 38
4.2.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Claus Process Technology, 2016 – 2026 39
4.3 Tail Gas Treatment 40
4.3.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Tail Gas Treatment Technology, 2016 – 2026 41
4.4 ‘Others’ (Tail Gas Incineration, Liquid RedOX Sulfur Removal & Recovery, etc.) 42
4.4.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Other Technology, 2016 – 2026 43

Chapter 5 Global Sulfur Recovery Technology (SRT) Market, By Source Of Recovery 44
5.1 Overview 44
5.1.1 Global SRT Market Value, by Source of Recovery, 2017 & 2026 (Share, %) 44
5.1.2 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016-2026 45
5.2 Oil & Gas 45
5.2.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), By Oil & Gas, 2016 – 2026 46
5.3 Other Source (Sulfur Mining, Coal Gasification, etc.) 47
5.3.1 SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), By Other Source, 2016 – 2026 47

Chapter 6 Global Sulfur Recovery Technology (SRT) Market, by Capacity 48
6.1 Overview 48
6.1.1 Global SRT Market Value, by Capacity, 2017 & 2026 (Share, %) 48
6.2 ‘Up to 100 t/d’ (tons per day) 49
6.2.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by ‘Up to 100 t/d’ Capacity, 2016 – 2026 49
6.3 101-200 t/d (tons per day) 50
6.3.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by 101-200 t/d, 2016 – 2026 50
6.4 201-300 t/d (tons per day) 51
6.4.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by 201-300 t/d Capacity, 2016 – 2026 51
6.5 ‘Above 300 t/d’ (tons per day) 52
6.5.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by ‘Above 300 t/d’ Capacity, 2016 – 2026 52

Chapter 7 Global Sulfur Recovery Technology (SRT) Market, by Geography 53
7.1 Overview 53
7.1.1 Global SRT Market Value Share (%), by Geography, 2017 & 2026 54
7.1.2 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Geography, 2016-2026 54
7.2 North America 55
7.2.1 North America Sulfur Production, by Source, 2017 (Share, %) 55
7.2.2 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 - 2026 56
7.2.3 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 - 2026 56
7.2.4 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 - 2026 57
7.2.5 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 - 2026 57
7.2.6 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 - 2026 58
7.3 Europe 59
7.3.1 Number of Refineries and Their Percentage Capacity in EU, 2017 59
7.3.2 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 - 2026 60
7.3.3 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 - 2026 61
7.3.4 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 - 2026 61
7.3.5 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 - 2026 62
7.3.6 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 - 2026 62
7.4 Asia Pacific 63
7.4.1 Asia-Pacific Refining Capacity and Announced Expansions (million b/d) 63
7.4.2 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 - 2026 64
7.4.3 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 - 2026 64
7.4.4 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 - 2026 65
7.4.5 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 - 2026 65
7.4.6 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 - 2026 66
7.5 Latin America 67
7.5.1 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 - 2026 68
7.5.2 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 - 2026 68
7.5.3 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 - 2026 69
7.5.4 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 - 2026 69
7.5.5 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 - 2026 70
7.6 Middle East & Africa 71
7.6.1 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 - 2026 71
7.6.2 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 - 2026 72
7.6.3 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 - 2026 72
7.6.4 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 - 2026 73
7.6.5 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 - 2026 73

Chapter 8 Company Profiles 74
8.1 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 74
8.2 The Linde Group 77
8.3 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 80
8.4 Royal Dutch Shell Plc 83
8.5 John Wood Group Plc. 86
8.6 Amec Foster Wheeler 89
8.7 Black & Veatch Holding Company 92
8.8 Chiyoda Corporation 94
8.9 Fluor Corporation 97
8.10 GTC Technology US, LLC 100
8.11 CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V. 102
8.12 BASF SE 105
8.13 Praxair, Inc 108
8.14 Phoenix Equipment Corporation 111

* SRT - Sulfur Recovery Technology

FIG. 1 Global Sulfur Recovery Technology (SRT) Market: Research Methodology 17
FIG. 2 Global SRT Market Segmentation 21
FIG. 3 Global SRT Market Value, by Technology, 2017 (US$ Mn) 24
FIG. 4 Global SRT Market Value, by Source of Recovery, 2017 (US$ Mn) 25
FIG. 5 Global SRT Market Value, by Capacity, 2017 (US$ Mn) 26
FIG. 6 Global SRT Market Value, by Geography, 2017 (US$ Mn) 27
FIG. 7 Attractive Investment Proposition, by Geography, 2017 35
FIG. 8 Global Market Positioning of Key Sulfur Recovery Technology Manufacturers, 2017 36
FIG. 9 Global SRT Market Value, by Technology, 2017 & 2026 (Share, %) 38
FIG. 10 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Claus Process, 2016 – 2026 39
FIG. 11 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Tail Gas Treatment Technology, 2016 – 2026 41
FIG. 12 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Other Technology, 2016 – 2026 43
FIG. 13 Global SRT Market Value, by Source of Recovery, 2017 & 2026 (Share, %) 44
FIG. 14 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), By Oil & Gas, 2016 – 2026 46
FIG. 15 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), By Other Source, 2016 – 2026 47
FIG. 16 Global SRT Market Value, by Capacity, 2017 & 2026 (Share, %) 48
FIG. 17 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by ‘Up to 100 t/d’, 2016 – 2026 49
FIG. 18 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by 101-200 t/d, 2016 – 2026 50
FIG. 19 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by 201-300 t/d Capacity, 2016 – 2026 51
FIG. 20 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by ‘Above 300 t/d’ Capacity, 2016 – 2026 52
FIG. 21 Global SRT Market Value Share (%), by Geography, 2017 & 2026 54
FIG. 22 North America Sulfur Production, by Source, 2017 (Share, %) 55
FIG. 23 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 - 2026 56
FIG. 24 Number of Refineries and Their Percentage Capacity in EU, 2017 59
FIG. 25 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 - 2026 60
FIG. 26 Asia-Pacific Refining Capacity and Announced Expansions (million b/d) 63
FIG. 27 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 - 2026 64
FIG. 28 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 - 2026 68
FIG. 29 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 - 2026 71a

TABLE 1 Market Snapshot: Global Sulfur Recovery Technology (SRT) Market 23
TABLE 2 Impact Indicators 34
TABLE 3 Impact Analysis of Drivers, Challenges and Opportunities 34
TABLE 4 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016-2026 45
TABLE 5 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Geography, 2016-2026 54
TABLE 6 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 - 2026 56
TABLE 7 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 - 2026 57
TABLE 8 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 - 2026 57
TABLE 9 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 - 2026 58
TABLE 10 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 - 2026 61
TABLE 11 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 - 2026 61
TABLE 12 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 - 2026 62
TABLE 13 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 - 2026 62
TABLE 14 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 - 2026 64
TABLE 15 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 - 2026 65
TABLE 16 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 - 2026 65
TABLE 17 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 - 2026 66
TABLE 18 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 - 2026 68
TABLE 19 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 - 2026 69
TABLE 20 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 - 2026 69
TABLE 21 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 - 2026 70
TABLE 22 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 - 2026 72
TABLE 23 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 - 2026 72
TABLE 24 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 - 2026 73
TABLE 25 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 - 2026 73
TABLE 26 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 74
TABLE 27 The Linde Group: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 77
TABLE 28 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 80
TABLE 29 Royal Dutch Shell plc: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 83
TABLE 30 John Wood Group Plc.: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 86
TABLE 31 Amec Foster Wheeler: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Recent Development/Business Strategies) 89
TABLE 32 Black & Veatch Holding Company: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Recent Developments/Business Strategies) 92
TABLE 33 Chiyoda Corporation: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Recent Developments/Business Strategies) 94
TABLE 34 Fluor Corporation: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 97
TABLE 35 GTC Technology US, LLC: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Recent Development/Business Strategies) 100
TABLE 36 Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. : Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 102
TABLE 37 BASF SE: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 105
TABLE 38 Praxair, Inc: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 108
TABLE 39 Phoenix Equipment Corporation.: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 111

Choose License Type
Connect With Us
+1-800-361-8290
24/7 Research Support

Our Clients