Home » Chemicals » Sulfur Recovery Technology Market

Sulfur Recovery Technology Market By Technology (Claus Process, Til Gas Treatment, Others), By Source Of Recovery (Oil & Gas, Other), By Capacity (‘Up To 100 t/d’, 101-200 t/d (tons per day), 201-300 t/d (Tons Per Day), ‘Above 300 t/d’ (Tons Per Day)) – Growth, Future Prospects & Competitive Analysis, 2018 – 2026

Summary
Table Of Content

Market Insights

The sulphur recovery technology market is expected to reach US$ 3,402.3 mn by 2026, growing at a 9.0% CAGR from 2018 to 2026. In 2017, Asia Pacific led the sulphur recovery technology market and was estimated to be the fastest-growing region between 2018 and 2026.

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has its present in a number of gaseous waste streams from oil refineries, natural gas plants, and wastewater treatment, among other processes. These streams usually contain sulfur, water vapor, carbon dioxide, trace quantities of hydrocarbons, and ammonia. Waste gases with ammonia and sulfur are termed “sour gases,” whereas those without the presence of ammonia are referred to as “acid gases.” These waste streams are used to recover sulfur just before flaring them.

Sulfur recovery from soured or acidic gas involves the application of the Claus Process, which uses the reaction between hydrogen sulphide and sulphur dioxide (produced in the Claus Process furnace from the combustion of H2S with air and/or oxygen). This reaction yields elemental sulphur and water vapor. The conventional sulphur recovery process (Claus Thermal Stage and Claus Catalytic Stage) is based upon the extraction of sulphur by in-situ condensation within the Claus Reactor. The laws pertaining to air pollution are stringent. Based on these laws, lower-grade fuel is required to be refined with a minimum sulphur concentration. This is one of the prime factors that is expected to drive the global sulphur recovery technology market.

Access crucial information at unmatched prices!

Request your free sample report today & start making informed decisions powered by Credence Research!

Download Free Sample

Some of the major advancements in the Claus Process to achieve up to 99.99% sulphur recovery are the application of an absorptive water separation process in the catalytic reactor stage, the cold bed absorption (CBA) process applied at low temperatures (below the sulphur dew point temperature), and the modified Claus Process with a tail gas clean up the unit (TGCU) used for very high sulphur recovery as per necessity. With these advancements, an overall sulphur recovery of up to 99.5–99.9% is possible.

Market Overview, Value (US$ Mn)

The Sulfur Recovery Technology Market was dominated by the Claus Process Technology Segment.

The SRUs are used to derive elemental sulphur from oil and gas refining. H2S is combusted in the “reaction furnace” to form SO2. The H2S and SO2 then react at an approximate ratio of 2:1 (2 parts H2S and 1 part SO2) to form elemental sulphur in the Claus reactors. After each catalytic stage, liquid sulphur is recovered in various Claus condensers. The remaining unreacted SO2 and H2S are then passed to the next stage, in which the equilibrium-limited Claus reaction basically continues in the presence of the Claus catalyst. The remaining sulphur in these tail gases is recovered through a process known as “tail gas processing” or “tail gas incineration.

“Incineration is an oxidation process to convert SOx into elemental sulfur. Trends show that a two-bed catalytic Claus plant can attain 94% to 96% efficiency. The range of recoveries varies from 96% to 97.5% for a three-bed catalytic plant, whereas they range from 97% to 98.5% for a four-bed catalytic plant. At normal pressures and operating temperatures, the Claus reaction is basically thermodynamically limited to the range between 97% and 98% recovery. Tail gas from the Claus plant still contains 0.8% to 1.5% sulphur compounds. The Claus Process is the primary method of sulphur recovery. Before the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, which concluded in December 2015, most of the refineries globally had infrastructure with single-stage Claus plants for sulphur recovery. This is capable of recovering up to 92% of sulfur, depending on the internal processes involved. With stricter environmental regulations now in place, there is a requirement for single-stage Claus plants to expand into corresponding multi-stage plants. All this capacity expansion is to achieve 99.5–99.90% sulphur recovery from the feed stream.

In 2017, oil and gas were identified as the dominant source of the recovery segment.

Sulfur is mainly recovered from crude oil and natural gas processing. Sulfur recovery from the oil and gas market is on the rise, as it is the largest source of sulphur and is expected to maintain its dominance throughout the forecast period. With an objective to minimize sulphur concentrations in various refined products, sulphur is basically recovered during refining operations with the help of various technologies. Low concentrations of sulphur that find application in fuel gases are compulsory to comply with emission standards for process boilers, heaters, and flue gases. Environmental pressure to reduce sulphur emissions is also fueling the growth of the sulphur recovery technology market in the oil and gas industry. For instance, to meet U.S. environmental standards for sulphur emissions, 99.8% of the sulphur must be recovered from natural gas processing. The Claus Process and tail gas treating processes are the most preferred processes to achieve the aforementioned recovery levels.

Up to 100 t/d (tons per day) is expected to be the largest capacity segment in 2017

The SRUs in the refineries have sulphur recovery and removal capacities of 5 t/d to 60 t/d. These refineries are equipped with a single-stage Claus Process for the recovery and removal of sulphur from the feed stream. ‘ Up to 100 t/d of sulphur recovery falls under this segment. The smaller sulphur recovery plants generally require additional space for the accommodation of separate plants to meet the existing mandate of nearly 99.9% sulphur-free output. These plants may incur a lot of interruptions in the existing facility, and the least interruption in the sulphur recovery process is what is desired in sulphur recovery plants.

Asia Pacific is the largest region in the global sulphur recovery technology market.

Asia Pacific is the most attractive market because of its healthy growth rate and increasing environmental concerns, and government regulations in the region. High growth potential for the development of sulphur recovery technology is observed in economies such as India, China, Malaysia, South Korea, and Indonesia. China and India are the two largest markets for sulphur recovery technology in the Asia Pacific region, collectively contributing more than half of the regional demand. In 2017, China alone accounted for a major market share of the regional demand for sulphur recovery technology. In 2016, the average gravity of crude oil processed in the region was projected to decrease from 35.9 °API (the American Petroleum Institute gravity) to 35.4 °API in 2035, and the corresponding sulphur content will increase from 1.02 wt% to 1.40 wt% in 2035.

North America was the second-largest market for sulphur recovery technology in 2017 and is expected to maintain its position throughout the forecast period. Increasing concern about the sulphur content in processed fuels and natural gas is leading to tighter regulation and more stringent standards for sulphur emissions from processing facilities in North America. The presence of large multinationals is making sulphur recovery systems more accessible to end users. Moreover, the launch of new technologies and systems with a higher percentage of recovery is stimulating market growth.

Manufacturers’ primary strategies are mergers and acquisitions.

Key players operating in the global sulphur recovery technology market include Royal Dutch Shell, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Exxon Mobil, The Linde Group, Chiyoda Corporation, and John Wood Group Plc. On March 1, 2016, Fluor Corp. acquired the Netherlands-based Stork Holding B.V., which is a global provider of modification, maintenance, and asset integrity services. Through this, Fluor can strengthen its market position in geographies such as the U.K., continental Europe, the Middle East, Asia-Pacific, and the Americas. On October 9, 2017, John Wood Group PLC, which is a global leader in the delivery of engineering, project, and technical services to industrial and energy markets, acquired Amec Foster Wheeler.

Periods of History and Forecast

This research considers 2017 as the base year and presents an analysis of segments from 2016 to 2026. In addition, the forecast period from 2018 to 2026is considered for the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) calculation for each respective segment.

Report Scope by Segments

The Sulfur Recovery Technology Market report represents an understanding of the current market dynamics and strategies. It also focuses on a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the overall market. The report covers the global sulphur recovery technology market by categorizing it in terms of technology, source of recovery, capacity, and geography. Publishing this broad research report aims to aid sulphur recovery technology market stakeholders and professionals in strategic initiatives and decisions in the sulphur recovery technology market.

This research report describes leading continents and their major countries, along with profiles of key players operating in the overall market and their planned developments. Our report further defines the overall market dynamics, such as drivers, challenges, and opportunities prevalent in the market, to understand the global elastomers market more explicitly. Our in-depth quantitative and qualitative analysis of each segment up to the country level highlights revenue pockets and investment opportunities in the market.

Shape Your Report to Specific Countries or Regions & Enjoy 30% Off!

Customize Now

Key questions are answered in this report.

Who are the distributors, traders, and dealers of sulphur recovery technology on the market?
What is expected to be the largest technology, source of recovery, and capacity segments in the market during the forecast period from 2018 to 2026?
What are the fastest-growing segments in the market for the forecast period?
What are the current market trends in the sulphur recovery technology market and the most valuable opportunities for the players?
How does the regulatory framework affect global as well as regional markets?
Which are the key players operating in the global market, and what are the strategies they have adopted?
What are the sales, revenue, business strategy, and product portfolio of the top manufacturers in the sulphur recovery technology market?
What are the market size and trends in emerging and developed markets?

Chapter 1 Preface 15
1.1 Report Description 15
1.1.1 Purpose of the Report 15
1.1.2 Target Audience 15
1.1.3 USP and Key Offerings 15
1.2 Research Scope 16
1.3 Research Methodology 17
1.3.1 Phase I – Secondary Research 17
1.3.2 Phase II – Primary Research 18
1.3.3 Top Down & Bottom Up Approach 18
1.3.3.1 Top-Down Approach 18
1.3.3.2 Bottom-Up Approach 19
1.3.4 Phase III – Expert Panel Review 19
1.3.5 Assumptions 19
1.4 Market Segmentation 21

Chapter 2 Executive Summary 22
2.1 Overview 22
2.2 Market Snapshot: Global SRT Market 23
2.3 Global SRT Market Value, by Technology, 2017 (US$ Mn) 24
2.4 Global SRT Market Value, by Source of Recovery, 2017 (US$ Mn) 25
2.5 Global SRT Market Value, by Capacity, 2017 (US$ Mn) 26
2.6 Global SRT Market Value, by Geography, 2017 (US$ Mn) 27

Chapter 3 Market Overview 28
3.1 Introduction 28
3.2 Market Dynamics 30
3.2.1 Market Drivers 30
3.2.1.1 Stringent Environmental Regulations for Sulfur Emission 30
3.2.1.2 Adoption of Advanced in Sulfur Recovery Technologies, in Oil and Gas Sector 32
3.2.2 Challenges 32
3.2.2.1 High Operational Expenditure Associated with Multistage Claus Process 32
3.2.3 Opportunities 33
3.2.3.1 Refineries are Adopting Specialized Tail Gas Treatment Recovery Process 33
3.2.3.2 Growing Demand for Sulfur among End-Application Industries 33
3.3 Impact Analysis of Drivers, Challenges and Opportunities During the Forecast Period 34
3.4 Attractive Investment Proposition, by Geography, 2016 35
3.5 Market Positioning of Key Players 36

Chapter 4 Global Sulfur Recovery Technology (SRT) Market, by Technology 37
4.1 Overview 37
4.1.1 Global SRT Market Value, by Technology, 2017 & 2026 (Share, %) 38
4.2 Claus Process 38
4.2.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Claus Process Technology, 2016 – 2026 39
4.3 Tail Gas Treatment 40
4.3.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Tail Gas Treatment Technology, 2016 – 2026 41
4.4 ‘Others’ (Tail Gas Incineration, Liquid RedOX Sulfur Removal & Recovery, etc.) 42
4.4.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Other Technology, 2016 – 2026 43

Chapter 5 Global Sulfur Recovery Technology (SRT) Market, By Source Of Recovery 44
5.1 Overview 44
5.1.1 Global SRT Market Value, by Source of Recovery, 2017 & 2026 (Share, %) 44
5.1.2 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016-2026 45
5.2 Oil & Gas 45
5.2.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), By Oil & Gas, 2016 – 2026 46
5.3 Other Source (Sulfur Mining, Coal Gasification, etc.) 47
5.3.1 SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), By Other Source, 2016 – 2026 47

Chapter 6 Global Sulfur Recovery Technology (SRT) Market, by Capacity 48
6.1 Overview 48
6.1.1 Global SRT Market Value, by Capacity, 2017 & 2026 (Share, %) 48
6.2 ‘Up to 100 t/d’ (tons per day) 49
6.2.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by ‘Up to 100 t/d’ Capacity, 2016 – 2026 49
6.3 101-200 t/d (tons per day) 50
6.3.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by 101-200 t/d, 2016 – 2026 50
6.4 201-300 t/d (tons per day) 51
6.4.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by 201-300 t/d Capacity, 2016 – 2026 51
6.5 ‘Above 300 t/d’ (tons per day) 52
6.5.1 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by ‘Above 300 t/d’ Capacity, 2016 – 2026 52

Chapter 7 Global Sulfur Recovery Technology (SRT) Market, by Geography 53
7.1 Overview 53
7.1.1 Global SRT Market Value Share (%), by Geography, 2017 & 2026 54
7.1.2 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Geography, 2016-2026 54
7.2 North America 55
7.2.1 North America Sulfur Production, by Source, 2017 (Share, %) 55
7.2.2 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 – 2026 56
7.2.3 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 – 2026 56
7.2.4 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 – 2026 57
7.2.5 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 – 2026 57
7.2.6 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 – 2026 58
7.3 Europe 59
7.3.1 Number of Refineries and Their Percentage Capacity in EU, 2017 59
7.3.2 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 – 2026 60
7.3.3 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 – 2026 61
7.3.4 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 – 2026 61
7.3.5 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 – 2026 62
7.3.6 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 – 2026 62
7.4 Asia Pacific 63
7.4.1 Asia-Pacific Refining Capacity and Announced Expansions (million b/d) 63
7.4.2 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 – 2026 64
7.4.3 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 – 2026 64
7.4.4 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 – 2026 65
7.4.5 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 – 2026 65
7.4.6 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 – 2026 66
7.5 Latin America 67
7.5.1 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 – 2026 68
7.5.2 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 – 2026 68
7.5.3 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 – 2026 69
7.5.4 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 – 2026 69
7.5.5 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 – 2026 70
7.6 Middle East & Africa 71
7.6.1 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 – 2026 71
7.6.2 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 – 2026 72
7.6.3 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 – 2026 72
7.6.4 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 – 2026 73
7.6.5 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 – 2026 73

Chapter 8 Company Profiles 74
8.1 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 74
8.2 The Linde Group 77
8.3 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 80
8.4 Royal Dutch Shell Plc 83
8.5 John Wood Group Plc. 86
8.6 Amec Foster Wheeler 89
8.7 Black & Veatch Holding Company 92
8.8 Chiyoda Corporation 94
8.9 Fluor Corporation 97
8.10 GTC Technology US, LLC 100
8.11 CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V. 102
8.12 BASF SE 105
8.13 Praxair, Inc 108
8.14 Phoenix Equipment Corporation 111

List of Figures

FIG. 1 Global Sulfur Recovery Technology (SRT) Market: Research Methodology 17
FIG. 2 Global SRT Market Segmentation 21
FIG. 3 Global SRT Market Value, by Technology, 2017 (US$ Mn) 24
FIG. 4 Global SRT Market Value, by Source of Recovery, 2017 (US$ Mn) 25
FIG. 5 Global SRT Market Value, by Capacity, 2017 (US$ Mn) 26
FIG. 6 Global SRT Market Value, by Geography, 2017 (US$ Mn) 27
FIG. 7 Attractive Investment Proposition, by Geography, 2017 35
FIG. 8 Global Market Positioning of Key Sulfur Recovery Technology Manufacturers, 2017 36
FIG. 9 Global SRT Market Value, by Technology, 2017 & 2026 (Share, %) 38
FIG. 10 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Claus Process, 2016 – 2026 39
FIG. 11 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Tail Gas Treatment Technology, 2016 – 2026 41
FIG. 12 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Other Technology, 2016 – 2026 43
FIG. 13 Global SRT Market Value, by Source of Recovery, 2017 & 2026 (Share, %) 44
FIG. 14 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), By Oil & Gas, 2016 – 2026 46
FIG. 15 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), By Other Source, 2016 – 2026 47
FIG. 16 Global SRT Market Value, by Capacity, 2017 & 2026 (Share, %) 48
FIG. 17 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by ‘Up to 100 t/d’, 2016 – 2026 49
FIG. 18 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by 101-200 t/d, 2016 – 2026 50
FIG. 19 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by 201-300 t/d Capacity, 2016 – 2026 51
FIG. 20 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by ‘Above 300 t/d’ Capacity, 2016 – 2026 52
FIG. 21 Global SRT Market Value Share (%), by Geography, 2017 & 2026 54
FIG. 22 North America Sulfur Production, by Source, 2017 (Share, %) 55
FIG. 23 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 – 2026 56
FIG. 24 Number of Refineries and Their Percentage Capacity in EU, 2017 59
FIG. 25 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 – 2026 60
FIG. 26 Asia-Pacific Refining Capacity and Announced Expansions (million b/d) 63
FIG. 27 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 – 2026 64
FIG. 28 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 – 2026 68
FIG. 29 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), 2016 – 2026 71a

List of Tables

TABLE 1 Market Snapshot: Global Sulfur Recovery Technology (SRT) Market 23
TABLE 2 Impact Indicators 34
TABLE 3 Impact Analysis of Drivers, Challenges and Opportunities 34
TABLE 4 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016-2026 45
TABLE 5 Global SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Geography, 2016-2026 54
TABLE 6 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 – 2026 56
TABLE 7 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 – 2026 57
TABLE 8 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 – 2026 57
TABLE 9 North America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 – 2026 58
TABLE 10 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 – 2026 61
TABLE 11 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 – 2026 61
TABLE 12 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 – 2026 62
TABLE 13 Europe SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 – 2026 62
TABLE 14 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 – 2026 64
TABLE 15 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 – 2026 65
TABLE 16 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 – 2026 65
TABLE 17 Asia Pacific SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 – 2026 66
TABLE 18 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 – 2026 68
TABLE 19 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 – 2026 69
TABLE 20 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 – 2026 69
TABLE 21 Latin America SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 – 2026 70
TABLE 22 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Technology, 2016 – 2026 72
TABLE 23 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Source of Recovery, 2016 – 2026 72
TABLE 24 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Capacity, 2016 – 2026 73
TABLE 25 Middle East & Africa SRT Market Value (US$ Mn), by Country, 2016 – 2026 73
TABLE 26 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 74
TABLE 27 The Linde Group: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 77
TABLE 28 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 80
TABLE 29 Royal Dutch Shell plc: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 83
TABLE 30 John Wood Group Plc.: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 86
TABLE 31 Amec Foster Wheeler: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Recent Development/Business Strategies) 89
TABLE 32 Black & Veatch Holding Company: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Recent Developments/Business Strategies) 92
TABLE 33 Chiyoda Corporation: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Recent Developments/Business Strategies) 94
TABLE 34 Fluor Corporation: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 97
TABLE 35 GTC Technology US, LLC: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Recent Development/Business Strategies) 100
TABLE 36 Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. : Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 102
TABLE 37 BASF SE: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 105
TABLE 38 Praxair, Inc: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 108
TABLE 39 Phoenix Equipment Corporation.: Company Snapshot (Business Description; Product Portfolio; Financial Information; Business Strategies) 111

Frequently Asked Question:

What is the size of Sulfur Recovery Technology Market?

The market for Sulfur Recovery Technology Market is expected to reach USD$ 3,402.3 Mn in 2026.

What is the Sulfur Recovery Technology Market CAGR?

The Sulfur Recovery Technology Market is expected to see significant CAGR growth over the coming years, at 9.0%.

What is the Forecast period considered for Sulfur Recovery Technology Market?

The report is forecasted from 2018 -2026.

What is the base year considered for Sulfur Recovery Technology Market?

The base year of this report is 2017.

Who are the major players in this market?

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Exxon Mobil, The Linde Group, Chiyoda Corporation, and John Wood Group Plc. On March 1, 2016, Fluor Corp. acquired the Netherlands-based Stork Holding B.V. are some of the major players in the global market.

Purchase Options

Single User

$3699

Multi User

$4699

Custom Report

$6699

Request Free Sample

Have a question?

Don’t settle for less – trust Mitul to help you find the best solution.

Call: +91 6232 49 3207

EMAIL MITUL

Report delivery within 24 to 48 hours

– Other Info –

–What people say?-

I am very impressed with the information in this report. The author clearly did their research when they came up with this product and it has already given me a lot of ideas.

Jana Schmidt
CEDAR CX Technologies

– Connect with us –