Home » Information and Communications Technology » Technology & Media » U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and PACS Market

U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and PACS Market

U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market By Type (Vendor Neutral Archive (VNA), Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS)); By Mode of Delivery (On-Premise, Cloud-Based, Hybrid); By End-User (Hospitals, Diagnostic Imaging Centers, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Specialty Clinics); By Imaging Modality (X-ray, Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Ultrasound, Others) – Growth, Share, Opportunities & Competitive Analysis, 2024 – 2032

Summary
Table Of Content

REPORT ATTRIBUTE	DETAILS
Historical Period	2020-2023
Base Year	2024
Forecast Period	2025-2032
U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Size 2024	USD 1,287.40 million
U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market, CGR	7.91%
U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Size 2032	USD 2,366.38 million

Market Overview

U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) market size was valued at USD 1,287.40 million in 2024 and is anticipated to reach USD 2,366.38 million by 2032, at a CAGR of 7.91% during the forecast period (2024-2032).

The growth of the U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) market is driven by the rising demand for efficient image management solutions, growing healthcare digitization, and the increasing volume of medical imaging procedures. As healthcare providers strive to enhance interoperability and streamline data access across various departments, the adoption of VNA and PACS solutions continues to gain momentum. Additionally, the shift toward value-based care and the need for secure, long-term storage of imaging data support the market’s expansion. Technological advancements such as AI-powered image analysis, cloud-based storage, and integration with electronic health records (EHRs) are further accelerating adoption. Moreover, regulatory initiatives promoting data standardization and patient-centric care models are reinforcing the importance of scalable and vendor-neutral systems. These trends position VNA and PACS technologies as essential components in modern healthcare IT infrastructure, enabling improved diagnostic efficiency and clinical collaboration.

The geographical landscape of the U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) market reflects diverse adoption rates across regions, with strong uptake in urban centers and technologically advanced states. Healthcare institutions in the Western and Northeastern U.S. are leading in digital transformation, while the Southern and Midwestern regions are gradually expanding adoption amid growing demand for efficient healthcare delivery. Major industry players driving innovation and market growth include GE Healthcare, IBM Watson Health, Merge Healthcare, Carestream Health, and Change Healthcare. These companies offer comprehensive imaging solutions, combining AI-driven diagnostics, cloud capabilities, and enterprise-wide data integration. Other key contributors such as McKesson Corporation, Intelerad Medical Systems, Sectra AB, Agfa HealthCare, and Ambra Health are also enhancing the competitive landscape through strategic partnerships, product enhancements, and scalable platforms. The market’s future trajectory is shaped by these players’ ongoing investments in interoperability, cybersecurity, and cloud-based imaging infrastructure.

Access crucial information at unmatched prices!

Request your sample report today & start making informed decisions powered by Credence Research!

Download Sample

Market Insights

The U.S. VNA and PACS market was valued at USD 1,287.40 million in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 2,366.38 million by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 7.91%.

The Global VNA and PACS market was valued at USD 4,411.05 million in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 8,046.15 million by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 7.80% from 2024 to 2032.

Increasing demand for interoperability and efficient image management drives market growth.
Adoption of AI and cloud-based solutions is reshaping the market, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and scalability.
Competitive landscape includes key players like GE Healthcare, IBM Watson Health, and McKesson Corporation.
Market restraints include high implementation costs and integration challenges with existing healthcare systems.
Rising need for healthcare digitization and the shift to value-based care are key drivers of VNA and PACS adoption.
Regionally, the Western U.S. leads the market, followed closely by the Southern and Northeastern U.S., with varied adoption rates across regions.

Report Scope

This report segments the U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market as follows:

Market Drivers

Rising Demand for Interoperability and Data Integration

One of the primary drivers of the U.S. VNA and PACS market is the growing demand for interoperability across healthcare systems. As providers increasingly operate within integrated delivery networks (IDNs), the need for seamless communication between disparate systems has become critical. VNAs enable centralized image storage in standardized formats, allowing data to be shared easily across departments and institutions regardless of the originating vendor. This capability supports more efficient collaboration among healthcare professionals and helps improve continuity of care, especially in multi-site or cross-organizational environments. As a result, healthcare institutions are investing in VNA and PACS solutions to reduce silos and streamline clinical workflows.

Expansion of Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Procedures

The volume of medical imaging procedures in the U.S. has been steadily increasing due to the rise in chronic diseases, aging population, and growing awareness of early diagnosis. As imaging technologies such as MRI, CT scans, and ultrasound become more prevalent, healthcare facilities face the challenge of managing and storing large volumes of imaging data. For instance, approximately 710 million medical imaging diagnostic procedures were performed in the U.S. in 2023, with projections estimating global imaging procedures will surpass 5 billion annually by 2030. PACS platforms enable efficient storage, retrieval, and distribution of images, while VNAs ensure long-term archiving in a vendor-agnostic format. This growing reliance on imaging in diagnostics and treatment planning is pushing healthcare organizations to adopt scalable, high-performance VNA and PACS systems to support their expanding imaging infrastructure.

Shift Toward Value-Based and Patient-Centric Care

The U.S. healthcare system is undergoing a significant transformation toward value-based care, which emphasizes improved patient outcomes, cost-efficiency, and data-driven decision-making. VNAs and PACS play a vital role in this transition by enabling timely access to imaging records, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, and reducing redundancy in imaging tests. For instance, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has shifted the focus of healthcare delivery toward value-based care programs, emphasizing care coordination and quality over quantity. Moreover, patient-centric care models demand greater transparency and accessibility of medical information, which these systems support through secure, centralized repositories that can integrate with Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and patient portals. By improving data accessibility and supporting coordinated care, VNA and PACS solutions align with the goals of value-based healthcare initiatives.

Technological Advancements and Regulatory Support

Advancements in cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning are transforming the capabilities of VNA and PACS platforms. Cloud-based solutions offer scalability, remote access, and disaster recovery capabilities, making them attractive for both large hospitals and smaller clinics. AI tools are increasingly being integrated to assist in image analysis, prioritization, and decision support, further enhancing clinical efficiency. At the same time, regulatory initiatives from bodies like the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) are promoting data standardization and interoperability. These policy frameworks provide a conducive environment for the adoption of VNA and PACS solutions, ensuring compliance while supporting innovation in healthcare IT.

Market Trends

Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Enhances Diagnostic Capabilities

The incorporation of AI and machine learning into VNA and PACS platforms is revolutionizing medical imaging. These technologies enable automated image analysis, anomaly detection, and predictive diagnostics, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. For instance, AI-enhanced PACS systems have significantly improved workflow efficiency, with radiologists able to process and analyze images up to 31% faster than traditional methods. AI-powered systems assist radiologists by highlighting suspicious regions within scans and generating preliminary reports, which reduces diagnostic errors and increases productivity. Moreover, AI facilitates intelligent workflow automation, enhancing image indexing, retrieval, and reporting functions within VNA and PACS systems. This integration supports quicker diagnoses and improved patient outcomes.

Cloud-Based Solutions Offer Scalability and Accessibility

The shift towards cloud-based VNA and PACS solutions is gaining momentum due to their scalability, cost-effectiveness, and remote accessibility. Cloud deployment allows healthcare providers to store, manage, and exchange medical images securely over the internet, facilitating seamless collaboration among professionals regardless of location. For instance, Microsoft’s Azure-based PACS VNA provides a cost-effective storage solution with exabyte-plus data scalability and throughput elasticity. This model eliminates the need for extensive on-premises infrastructure, reducing upfront costs and simplifying maintenance. Additionally, cloud-based systems enhance disaster recovery capabilities and support telemedicine and teleradiology services, aligning with the growing demand for remote healthcare delivery.

Emphasis on Interoperability and Data Standardization

Achieving interoperability and data standardization remains a critical focus in the VNA and PACS market. Healthcare systems generate vast amounts of imaging data, necessitating efficient management and exchange protocols. By adhering to industry standards such as DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) and HL7 (Health Level Seven), VNA and PACS systems facilitate seamless integration with other healthcare IT systems like electronic health records (EHRs) and radiology information systems (RIS). Enhanced interoperability promotes streamlined workflows, reduces errors, and improves continuity of care across diverse healthcare settings.

Growth of Telemedicine and Remote Diagnostics

The expansion of telemedicine and remote diagnostics is influencing the adoption of VNA and PACS solutions. These systems support the secure sharing of medical images and associated data over the internet, enabling healthcare professionals to collaborate and make informed decisions without geographical constraints. The integration of advanced analytics and AI further enhances the capabilities of remote diagnostics, allowing for timely and accurate assessments. This trend aligns with the increasing emphasis on patient-centric care and the need for accessible healthcare services.

Market Challenges Analysis

High Implementation Costs and Infrastructure Limitations

One of the primary challenges hindering the adoption of VNA and PACS solutions in the U.S. is the high cost of implementation and ongoing maintenance. Setting up a robust VNA or PACS infrastructure often requires substantial upfront investment in hardware, software, and IT resources. Smaller healthcare facilities and rural providers may struggle to allocate sufficient capital, especially when budget constraints are tight. In addition to financial concerns, there are infrastructure limitations such as insufficient data storage capacity, outdated imaging equipment, or limited network bandwidth that complicate deployment. For instance, the National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) has identified infrastructure limitations as a key barrier to PACS adoption, emphasizing the need for scalable solutions. These barriers can delay digital transformation efforts and widen the gap between technologically advanced institutions and under-resourced healthcare settings, impeding the overall goal of nationwide interoperability.

Data Security, Compliance, and System Integration Complexities

As medical imaging data becomes increasingly digitized and cloud-based, data security and regulatory compliance pose significant challenges. Healthcare organizations must ensure compliance with regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which mandates strict standards for data privacy and protection. Managing large volumes of sensitive imaging data while preventing unauthorized access, breaches, or system downtimes is a complex and resource-intensive task. Furthermore, integrating VNA and PACS solutions with existing electronic health records (EHRs), radiology information systems (RIS), and other clinical platforms remains a technical hurdle. Disparate data standards, legacy systems, and vendor-specific formats often result in interoperability issues, leading to inefficiencies and data silos. Addressing these technical and regulatory challenges is essential for ensuring secure, compliant, and seamless imaging workflows across healthcare ecosystems.

Market Opportunities

The U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) market presents substantial opportunities driven by the expanding scope of digital healthcare and a growing emphasis on data-driven decision-making. As healthcare providers increasingly prioritize interoperability, there is a rising demand for systems that can seamlessly consolidate and manage imaging data across multiple departments and care settings. VNAs, with their vendor-agnostic architecture, are particularly well-positioned to meet this need by enabling long-term, standardized storage of imaging data. This not only facilitates efficient data sharing and collaboration but also supports compliance with evolving regulatory frameworks focused on data accessibility and patient engagement. Additionally, the shift toward value-based care encourages investments in technologies that enhance diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiency key advantages offered by modern PACS platforms.

Further opportunities emerge from the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence and cloud computing in healthcare imaging. Cloud-based VNA and PACS solutions offer scalability, flexibility, and remote access, making them especially attractive for health systems looking to support telehealth services and multi-site operations. Moreover, AI integration into PACS workflows enhances clinical productivity through automated image analysis, triage, and reporting. These innovations not only reduce the burden on radiologists but also improve turnaround times and diagnostic confidence. As personalized medicine and predictive analytics gain traction, imaging data becomes a critical asset for precision health strategies. Vendors that can offer secure, interoperable, and intelligent imaging solutions stand to benefit significantly. Consequently, the U.S. market offers a robust landscape for innovation, strategic partnerships, and expanded adoption, particularly among outpatient centers, diagnostic imaging chains, and integrated delivery networks aiming to optimize patient care through advanced imaging informatics.

Market Segmentation Analysis:

By Type:

The U.S. market for Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) is segmented by type into VNA and PACS, each serving distinct but complementary functions in medical imaging management. PACS solutions continue to dominate in clinical environments by enabling efficient image acquisition, storage, retrieval, and sharing within radiology departments. Their integration with modalities and imaging equipment makes them essential for real-time diagnostic workflows. However, VNAs are gaining strong traction as healthcare systems seek vendor-agnostic solutions that enable long-term image storage and cross-platform accessibility. VNA adoption is particularly strong among integrated delivery networks and multi-site health systems that require centralized access to imaging data across diverse applications and departments. The trend toward enterprise imaging and interoperability further strengthens the case for VNA deployment. While PACS remains vital for image management at the departmental level, the rising demand for data consolidation, long-term retention, and cross-system compatibility positions VNA as a strategic investment for scalable healthcare infrastructure.

By Mode of Delivery:

In terms of mode of delivery, the U.S. VNA and PACS market is segmented into on-premise, cloud-based, and hybrid solutions, each catering to different operational and strategic priorities. On-premise deployments are preferred by large institutions with dedicated IT infrastructure and strict data control requirements, offering high security and customization. However, cloud-based solutions are rapidly gaining popularity due to their scalability, cost-effectiveness, and remote accessibility—particularly appealing to outpatient clinics and smaller healthcare providers. The cloud model supports disaster recovery, seamless software updates, and efficient resource allocation, making it ideal for institutions embracing digital transformation. Hybrid models, combining on-premise control with cloud flexibility, offer a balanced approach for organizations seeking both data sovereignty and operational agility. This segment is especially relevant for providers navigating data compliance requirements while aiming to enhance system resilience and scalability. As healthcare increasingly embraces digital platforms, cloud and hybrid deployments are expected to drive future growth, reshaping how imaging data is stored, accessed, and managed across care settings.

Segments:

Based on Type:

Vendor Neutral Archive (VNA)
Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS)

Based on Mode of Delivery:

On-Premise
Cloud-Based
Hybrid

Based on End- User:

Hospitals
Diagnostic Imaging Centers
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Specialty Clinics

Based on Imaging Modality:

X-ray
Computed Tomography (CT)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Ultrasound
Others

Based on the Geography:

Western United States
Midwestern United States
Southern United States
Northeastern United States

Regional Analysis

Western United States

The Western United States holds approximately 28% of the national VNA and PACS market share. This region benefits from a strong concentration of leading academic medical centers and a robust technology sector, particularly in states like California and Washington. The presence of innovative healthcare systems and a focus on digital health initiatives contribute to the region’s significant market share. Additionally, the adoption of cloud-based solutions is prevalent, driven by the region’s advanced IT infrastructure and emphasis on interoperability.

Midwestern United States

The Midwestern United States accounts for about 22% of the national market share. This region is characterized by a mix of large urban healthcare systems and smaller rural hospitals. While some institutions have adopted advanced VNA and PACS solutions, others face challenges due to limited budgets and infrastructure constraints. However, initiatives aimed at improving healthcare access and quality are driving gradual adoption of these technologies, especially in larger metropolitan areas.

Southern United States

The Southern United States represents approximately 25% of the national VNA and PACS market. This region encompasses a diverse range of healthcare providers, from large academic medical centers to smaller community hospitals. The growing population and increasing demand for healthcare services are propelling the adoption of VNA and PACS solutions. Moreover, efforts to modernize healthcare infrastructure and improve patient care coordination are contributing to market growth in this region.

Northeastern United States

The Northeastern United States holds around 25% of the national market share. This region is home to some of the nation’s oldest and most prestigious healthcare institutions, which have been early adopters of advanced medical technologies. The emphasis on research, education, and high-quality patient care has driven the implementation of sophisticated VNA and PACS systems. Additionally, the region’s dense population and concentration of healthcare facilities support a strong market presence.

Key Player Analysis

GE Healthcare
IBM Watson Health
Merge Healthcare (an IBM Company)
Carestream Health
Change Healthcare
McKesson Corporation
Intelerad Medical Systems
Sectra AB
Agfa HealthCare
Ambra Health

Competitive Analysis

The competitive landscape of the U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) market is dominated by several leading players, including GE Healthcare, IBM Watson Health, Merge Healthcare, Carestream Health, Change Healthcare, McKesson Corporation, Intelerad Medical Systems, Sectra AB, Agfa HealthCare, and Ambra Health. These companies offer diverse product portfolios that span imaging solutions, AI integration, and cloud-based platforms designed to enhance clinical workflows, diagnostic accuracy, and data accessibility. Key players focus on developing advanced imaging solutions that integrate artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, and data interoperability. A significant portion of competition arises from the growing demand for AI-driven PACS systems that can automate image analysis, improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing workflow bottlenecks. Furthermore, the trend toward cloud-based solutions has intensified competition, as these platforms offer greater scalability, cost efficiency, and accessibility across multiple healthcare settings. In addition, players are increasingly emphasizing interoperability to ensure seamless integration with existing healthcare IT infrastructure, including Electronic Health Records (EHR) and Radiology Information Systems (RIS). As healthcare providers shift toward value-based care models, there is heightened competition among companies offering solutions that can support data consolidation, long-term image retention, and remote access. Vendors are also exploring partnerships and strategic collaborations to expand their reach, enhance product offerings, and improve market penetration in both urban and rural healthcare settings. Additionally, advancements in data security and regulatory compliance are critical factors driving competition, as healthcare providers seek solutions that adhere to stringent industry standards.

Recent Developments

In March 2024, at the European Congress of Radiology in Vienna, Philips unveiled new hardware innovations, focusing on integrating artificial intelligence into their imaging solutions to enhance diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency.
In February 2024, FUJIFILM Healthcare Americas Corporation announced that it’s Synapse VNA and Synapse Radiology PACS solutions (in Asia/Oceania) were ranked #1 in the 2024 Best in KLAS Awards: Software and Services. The recognition, based on insights from KLAS Research, highlights companies excelling in improving patient care through their software and services.
In January 2024, RamSoft (Canada) launched imaging EMR solution, named OmegaAI. The solution is a cloud-native, serverless imaging EMR software platform that consolidates VNA, Enterprise Imaging, PACS, RIS, simplified image exchange/sharing, routing & storage, a zero-footprint (ZFP) viewer, unified worklist, radiology reporting, document management, peer, patient portal, and a real-time business intelligence and analytics solution.
In November 2023, InsiteOne (US) announced to acquire BRIT Systems cloud native RIS/PACS/VNA solution to advance imaging workflows. This acquisition will continue to focus on developing cost-effective solutions that improve operational productivity while enhancing patient care.
In July 2023, Fujifilm Sonosite joined the newly formed Medical Imaging Division under the Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed), collaborating with industry leaders to advance medical imaging technologies.

Market Concentration & Characteristics

The market for Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) in the U.S. is moderately concentrated, with several key players dominating the competitive landscape while a variety of smaller, specialized firms contribute to niche segments. Large companies with established healthcare portfolios lead the market by offering integrated solutions that span imaging, data storage, AI-driven analytics, and cloud-based capabilities. These industry leaders benefit from strong brand recognition, extensive R&D resources, and long-standing relationships with healthcare providers. However, there is significant room for innovation, particularly in the areas of AI integration, cloud adoption, and system interoperability, creating opportunities for emerging players. The market is characterized by rapid technological advancements, a strong focus on regulatory compliance, and a growing emphasis on seamless integration with broader healthcare IT ecosystems. As the demand for more efficient, secure, and scalable imaging solutions rises, market dynamics are likely to shift toward increased collaboration and strategic partnerships among key players.

Report Coverage

The research report offers an in-depth analysis based on Type, Mode of Delivery, End-User, Imaging Modality and Geography. It details leading market players, providing an overview of their business, product offerings, investments, revenue streams, and key applications. Additionally, the report includes insights into the competitive environment, SWOT analysis, current market trends, as well as the primary drivers and constraints. Furthermore, it discusses various factors that have driven market expansion in recent years. The report also explores market dynamics, regulatory scenarios, and technological advancements that are shaping the industry. It assesses the impact of external factors and global economic changes on market growth. Lastly, it provides strategic recommendations for new entrants and established companies to navigate the complexities of the market.

Future Outlook

The U.S. VNA and PACS market will continue to grow as healthcare systems prioritize digital transformation and data management solutions.
The integration of artificial intelligence in PACS will enhance diagnostic accuracy and automate routine tasks, increasing operational efficiency.
Cloud-based VNA and PACS solutions will become more popular due to their scalability, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness.
Interoperability will be a key focus as healthcare organizations seek solutions that seamlessly integrate with existing Electronic Health Records (EHR) and Radiology Information Systems (RIS).
Data security and compliance with regulations like HIPAA will remain critical factors driving innovation in VNA and PACS technologies.
The adoption of hybrid VNA and PACS solutions will rise, offering the benefits of both on-premise control and cloud flexibility.
Increased demand for telemedicine and remote diagnostics will drive the need for cloud-enabled PACS that support off-site access to medical imaging.
Vendors will invest in AI-driven analytics for predictive insights, improving patient care and reducing diagnostic delays.
There will be a growing emphasis on patient-centric solutions, enabling enhanced data sharing and collaboration across healthcare networks.
As healthcare moves towards value-based care models, VNA and PACS technologies will play a critical role in improving diagnostic workflows and patient outcomes.

CHAPTER NO. 1 : INTRODUCTION 21

1.1.1. Report Description 21

Purpose of the Report 21

USP & Key Offerings 21

1.1.2. Key Benefits for Stakeholders 21

1.1.3. Target Audience 22

1.1.4. Report Scope 22

CHAPTER NO. 2 : EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 23

2.1. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Snapshot 23

2.1.1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market, 2018 – 2032 (USD Million) 24

CHAPTER NO. 3 : GEOPOLITICAL CRISIS IMPACT ANALYSIS 25

3.1. Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Palestine War Impacts 25

CHAPTER NO. 4 : VENDOR NEUTRAL ARCHIVES (VNA) AND PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (PACS) MARKET – INDUSTRY ANALYSIS 26

4.1. Introduction 26

4.2. Market Drivers 27

4.2.1. Increasing Adoption of Cloud-Based VNA & PACS Solutions 27

4.2.2. Growing Demand for Medical Imaging Due to Rising Chronic Diseases 28

4.3. Market Restraints 29

4.3.1. High Initial Implementation Costs 29

4.4. Market Opportunities 30

4.4.1. Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medical Imaging 30

4.5. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis 31

4.6. Buying Criteria 32

CHAPTER NO. 5 : IMPORT EXPORT ANALYSIS 33

5.1. Import Analysis by U.S. 33

5.1.1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Import Volume/Revenue, By U.S., 2018 – 2023 33

5.2. Export Analysis by U.S. 34

5.2.1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Export Volume/Revenue, By U.S., 2018 – 2023 34

CHAPTER NO. 6 : DEMAND SUPPLY ANALYSIS 35

6.1. Demand Analysis by U.S. 35

6.1.1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Demand Volume/Revenue, By U.S., 2018 – 2023 35

6.2. Supply Analysis by U.S. 36

6.2.1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Supply Volume/Revenue, By U.S., 2018 – 2023 36

CHAPTER NO. 7 : PRODUCTION ANALYSIS 37

7.1. Production Analysis by U.S. 37

7.1.1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Production Volume/Revenue, By U.S., 2018 – 2023 37

CHAPTER NO. 8 : PRICE ANALYSIS 38

8.1. Price Analysis by Type 38

8.1.1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Price, By Type, 2018 – 2023 38

8.1.2. U.S. Type Market Price, By Type, 2018 – 2023 38

CHAPTER NO. 9 : RAW MATERIALS ANALYSIS 39

9.1. Key Raw Materials and Suppliers 39

9.2. Key Raw Materials Price Trend 39

CHAPTER NO. 10 : MANUFACTURING COST ANALYSIS 40

10.1. Manufacturing Cost Analysis 40

10.2. Manufacturing Process 40

CHAPTER NO. 11 : ANALYSIS COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE 41

11.1. Company Market Share Analysis – 2023 41

11.2. Value Chain Analysis 41

11.2.1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market: Company Market Share, by Volume, 2023 42

11.2.2. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market: Company Market Share, by Revenue, 2023 43

11.2.3. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market: Top 6 Company Market Share, by Revenue, 2023 43

11.2.4. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market: Top 3 Company Market Share, by Revenue, 2023 44

11.3. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Company Volume Market Share, 2023 45

11.4. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Company Revenue Market Share, 2023 46

11.5. Company Assessment Metrics, 2023 46

11.5.1. Stars 46

11.5.2. Emerging Leaders 46

11.5.3. Pervasive Players 46

11.5.4. Participants 46

11.6. Start-ups /SMEs Assessment Metrics, 2023 47

11.6.1. Progressive Companies 47

11.6.2. Responsive Companies 47

11.6.3. Dynamic Companies 47

11.6.4. Starting Blocks 47

11.7. Strategic Developments 48

11.7.1. Acquisitions & Mergers 48

New Product Launch 48

U.S. Expansion 48

11.8. Key Players Product Matrix 49

CHAPTER NO. 12 : PESTEL & ADJACENT MARKET ANALYSIS 50

12.1. PESTEL 50

12.1.1. Political Factors 50

12.1.2. Economic Factors 50

12.1.3. Social Factors 50

12.1.4. Technological Factors 50

12.1.5. Environmental Factors 50

12.1.6. Legal Factors 50

12.2. Adjacent Market Analysis 50

CHAPTER NO. 13 : VENDOR NEUTRAL ARCHIVES (VNA) AND PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (PACS) MARKET – BY TYPE SEGMENT ANALYSIS 51

13.1. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Overview, by Type Segment 51

13.1.1. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue Share, By Type, 2023 & 2032 52

13.1.2. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Attractiveness Analysis, By Type 53

13.1.3. Incremental Revenue Growth Opportunity, by Type, 2024 – 2032 53

13.1.4. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Type, 2018, 2023, 2027 & 2032 54

13.2. Vendor Neutral Archive (VNA) 55

13.3. Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) 56

CHAPTER NO. 14 : VENDOR NEUTRAL ARCHIVES (VNA) AND PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (PACS) MARKET – BY MODE OF DELIVERY SEGMENT ANALYSIS 57

14.1. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Overview, by Mode of Delivery Segment 57

14.1.1. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue Share, By Mode of Delivery, 2023 & 2032 58

14.1.2. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Attractiveness Analysis, By Mode of Delivery 59

14.1.3. Incremental Revenue Growth Opportunity, by Mode of Delivery, 2024 – 2032 59

14.1.4. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Mode of Delivery, 2018, 2023, 2027 & 2032 60

14.2. On-Premise 61

14.3. Cloud-Based 62

14.4. Hybrid 63

CHAPTER NO. 15 : VENDOR NEUTRAL ARCHIVES (VNA) AND PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (PACS) MARKET – BY END-USER SEGMENT ANALYSIS 64

15.1. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Overview, by End-user Segment 64

15.1.1. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue Share, By End-user, 2023 & 2032 65

15.1.2. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Attractiveness Analysis, By End-user 66

15.1.3. Incremental Revenue Growth Opportunity, by End-user, 2024 – 2032 66

15.1.4. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By End-user, 2018, 2023, 2027 & 2032 67

15.2. Hospitals 68

15.3. Diagnostic Imaging Centers 69

15.4. Ambulatory Surgical Centers 70

15.5. Specialty Clinics 71

CHAPTER NO. 16 : VENDOR NEUTRAL ARCHIVES (VNA) AND PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (PACS) MARKET – BY IMAGING MODALITY SEGMENT ANALYSIS 72

16.1. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Overview, by Imaging Modality Segment 72

16.1.1. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue Share, By Imaging Modality, 2023 & 2032 73

16.1.2. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Attractiveness Analysis, By Imaging Modality 74

16.1.3. Incremental Revenue Growth Opportunity, by Imaging Modality, 2024 – 2032 74

16.1.4. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Imaging Modality, 2018, 2023, 2027 & 2032 75

16.2. X-ray 76

16.3. Computed Tomography (CT) 77

16.4. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) 78

16.5. Ultrasound 79

16.6. Others 80

CHAPTER NO. 17 : VENDOR NEUTRAL ARCHIVES (VNA) AND PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (PACS) MARKET – U.S. ANALYSIS 81

17.1. Type 81

17.1.1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Type, 2018 – 2023 (USD Million) 81

17.2. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Type, 2024 – 2032 (USD Million) 81

17.3. Mode of Delivery 82

17.3.1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Mode of Delivery, 2018 – 2023 (USD Million) 82

17.3.2. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Mode of Delivery, 2024 – 2032 (USD Million) 82

17.4. End-user 83

17.4.1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By End-user, 2018 – 2023 (USD Million) 83

17.4.2. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By End-user, 2024 – 2032 (USD Million) 83

17.5. Imaging Modality 84

17.5.1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Imaging Modality, 2018 – 2023 (USD Million) 84

17.5.2. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Imaging Modality, 2024 – 2032 (USD Million) 84

CHAPTER NO. 18 : COMPANY PROFILES 85

18.1. GE Healthcare 85

18.1.1. Company Overview 85

18.1.2. Product Portfolio 85

18.1.3. Swot Analysis 85

18.1.4. Business Strategy 86

18.1.5. Financial Overview 86

18.2. IBM Watson Health 87

18.3. Merge Healthcare (an IBM Company) 87

18.4. Carestream Health 87

18.5. Change Healthcare 87

18.6. McKesson Corporation 87

18.7. Intelerad Medical Systems 87

18.8. Sectra AB 87

18.9. Agfa HealthCare 87

18.10. Ambra Health 87

List of Figures

FIG NO. 1. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, 2018 – 2032 (USD Million) 25

FIG NO. 2. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis for U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market 32

FIG NO. 3. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Import Volume/Revenue, By U.S., 2018 – 2023 34

FIG NO. 4. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Export Volume/Revenue, By U.S., 2018 – 2023 35

FIG NO. 5. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Demand Volume/Revenue, By U.S., 2018 – 2023 36

FIG NO. 6. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Supply Volume/Revenue, By U.S., 2018 – 2023 37

FIG NO. 7. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Production Volume/Revenue, By U.S., 2018 – 2023 38

FIG NO. 8. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Price, By Type, 2018 – 2023 39

FIG NO. 9. Raw Materials Price Trend Analysis, 2018 – 2023 40

FIG NO. 10. Manufacturing Cost Analysis 41

FIG NO. 11. Manufacturing Process 41

FIG NO. 12. Value Chain Analysis for U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market 42

FIG NO. 13. Company Share Analysis, 2023 43

FIG NO. 14. Company Share Analysis, 2023 44

FIG NO. 15. Company Share Analysis, 2023 44

FIG NO. 16. Company Share Analysis, 2023 45

FIG NO. 17. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market – Company Volume Market Share, 2023 46

FIG NO. 18. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market – Company Revenue Market Share, 2023 47

FIG NO. 19. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue Share, By Type, 2023 & 2032 53

FIG NO. 20. Market Attractiveness Analysis, By Type 54

FIG NO. 21. Incremental Revenue Growth Opportunity by Type, 2024 – 2032 54

FIG NO. 22. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Type, 2018, 2023, 2027 & 2032 55

FIG NO. 23. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for Vendor Neutral Archive (VNA), Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 56

FIG NO. 24. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 57

FIG NO. 25. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue Share, By Mode of Delivery, 2023 & 2032 59

FIG NO. 26. Market Attractiveness Analysis, By Mode of Delivery 60

FIG NO. 27. Incremental Revenue Growth Opportunity by Mode of Delivery, 2024 – 2032 60

FIG NO. 28. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Mode of Delivery, 2018, 2023, 2027 & 2032 61

FIG NO. 29. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for On-Premise, Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 62

FIG NO. 30. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for Cloud-Based, Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 63

FIG NO. 31. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for Hybrid, Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 64

FIG NO. 32. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue Share, By End-user, 2023 & 2032 66

FIG NO. 33. Market Attractiveness Analysis, By End-user 67

FIG NO. 34. Incremental Revenue Growth Opportunity by End-user, 2024 – 2032 67

FIG NO. 35. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By End-user, 2018, 2023, 2027 & 2032 68

FIG NO. 36. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for Hospitals, Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 69

FIG NO. 37. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for Diagnostic Imaging Centers, Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 70

FIG NO. 38. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 71

FIG NO. 39. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for Specialty Clinics, Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 72

FIG NO. 40. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue Share, By Imaging Modality, 2023 & 2032 74

FIG NO. 41. Market Attractiveness Analysis, By Imaging Modality 75

FIG NO. 42. Incremental Revenue Growth Opportunity by Imaging Modality, 2024 – 2032 75

FIG NO. 43. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Imaging Modality, 2018, 2023, 2027 & 2032 76

FIG NO. 44. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for X-ray, Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 77

FIG NO. 45. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for Computed Tomography (CT), Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 78

FIG NO. 46. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 79

FIG NO. 47. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for Ultrasound, Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 80

FIG NO. 48. U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market for Others, Revenue (USD Million) 2018 – 2032 81

List of Tables

TABLE NO. 1. : U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market: Snapshot 24

TABLE NO. 2. : Drivers for the Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market: Impact Analysis 28

TABLE NO. 3. : Restraints for the Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market: Impact Analysis 30

TABLE NO. 4. : U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Type, 2018 – 2023 39

TABLE NO. 5. : Key Raw Materials & Suppliers 40

TABLE NO. 6. : U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Type, 2018 – 2023 (USD Million) 82

TABLE NO. 7. : U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Type, 2024 – 2032 (USD Million) 82

TABLE NO. 8. : U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Mode of Delivery, 2018 – 2023 (USD Million) 83

TABLE NO. 9. : U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Mode of Delivery, 2024 – 2032 (USD Million) 83

TABLE NO. 10. : U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By End-user, 2018 – 2023 (USD Million) 84

TABLE NO. 11. : U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By End-user, 2024 – 2032 (USD Million) 84

TABLE NO. 12. : U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Imaging Modality, 2018 – 2023 (USD Million) 85

TABLE NO. 13. : U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) Market Revenue, By Imaging Modality, 2024 – 2032 (USD Million) 85

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current size of the U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS)?

The market was valued at USD 1,287.40 million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 2,366.38 million by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 7.91%.

What factors are driving the growth of the U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS)?

Growth is fueled by healthcare digitization, rising imaging volumes, AI and cloud integration, and the push for interoperability and value-based care.

What are some challenges faced by the U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS)?

Key challenges include high implementation costs, infrastructure limitations, data security concerns, and integration with legacy systems.

Who are the major players in the U.S. Vendor Neutral Archives (VNA) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS)?

Major players include GE Healthcare, IBM Watson Health, Merge Healthcare, Carestream Health, and Change Healthcare.

Purchase Options

Single User

$2699

Multi User

$3699

Custom Report

$5699

Let us help you

MIKE, North America

+1 304 308 1216

KEITH PHILLIPS, Europe

+44 7809 866 263

EMAIL US

Request Sample

Report delivery within 24 to 48 hours

– Other Info –

–What people say?-

I am very impressed with the information in this report. The author clearly did their research when they came up with this product and it has already given me a lot of ideas.

Jana Schmidt
CEDAR CX Technologies

– Connect with us –